All categories

3 years ago

How do u multiply fractions?

2 answers:

8 0

When you multiply fractions all you need to do is multiply straight like lets say you have the fractions 1/3*1/2you multiply as if you would multiply normally like first the dominators 1*1=1 and now the numerators 3*2=6 now we put them in order 1/6.
Hope it helps.

Gennadij [26K]3 years ago

4 0

Multiplying fractions is easier to understand than dividing fractions.A fraction has two parts: a numerator and a denominator. For example: 1/5. In this example 1 would be the numerator and 5 would be the denominator. To multiply fractions all you do is multiple the numerators together and the denominators together.
Ex.) 1/10 x 1/10= 1/100
In this example you multiplied 1 by 1 and put that as the numerator on you answer. Then you multiply 10 by 10 and that is the denominator for your answer. Let me know if you need another example.

You might be interested in

I’m need this worked out step by step by tonight

Pie

9514 1404 393

Answer:

-3 ≤ x ≤ 19/3

Step-by-step explanation:

This inequality can be resolved to a compound inequality:

-7 ≤ (3x -5)/2 ≤ 7

Multiply all parts by 2.

-14 ≤ 3x -5 ≤ 14

Add 5 to all parts.

-9 ≤ 3x ≤ 19

Divide all parts by 3.

-3 ≤ x ≤ 19/3

_____

<em>Additional comment</em>

If you subtract 7 from both sides of the given inequality, it becomes ...

|(3x -5)/2| -7 ≤ 0

Then you're looking for the values of x that bound the region where the graph is below the x-axis. Those are shown in the attachment. For graphing purposes, I find this comparison to zero works well.

For an algebraic solution, I like the compound inequality method shown above. That only works well when the inequality is of the form ...

|f(x)| < (some number) . . . . or ≤

If the inequality symbol points away from the absolute value expression, or if the (some number) expression involves the variable, then it is probably better to write the inequality in two parts with appropriate domain specifications:

|f(x)| > g(x) ⇒ f(x) > g(x) for f(x) > 0; or -f(x) > g(x) for f(x) < 0

Any solutions to these inequalities must respect their domains.

8 0

3 years ago

I need help with this

emmasim [6.3K]

Answer:

31.4

Step-by-step explanation:

2x3.14x5=31.4

(2x3.14xRadius)

Please Give Me Brainliest lol

7 0

2 years ago

3/10x - 1 = 3/4

Allisa [31]

First you make -1 and 3/4 have a common denominator. 1 has a fraction of 1/1 so times four it is 4/4. Then you add on both sides in order to isolate x and you get 3/10x = 7/4.

Then you isolate x by multyiplying the reciprocal of 3/10 on both sides, 10/3.
3/10 and 10/3 cancel out and you get an answer of x = 70/4.

You could then simplify it to get 35/6 by finding a greasted common multiple of 12 and 70 which is 2 and dividing both by 2 to get a simpilier answer.

So the answer is x = 35/6

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Find the median and mean of the data which reflects the best measure of the center

galben [10]

Answer:

The mean reflects the best measure of the center

Step-by-step explanation:

12, 13, 13, 14, 21, 22, 23

Median: 14

Mean: 16.86

The mean reflects the best measure of the center

7 0

3 years ago

1. A catering company charges $95 plus $12.75 per plate of food. If the cost to cater a party was $656, how many people were at

son4ous [18]

Using arithmetic and the information provided, there were 6 persons at the party.

<h3>Number of people at the party</h3>

The question is asking us to use the cost of the plates served to each person to calculate the number of people in the party from the information available in the question.

Normal charge of a plate of food = $95
Additional charge on each plate of food = $12.75
Total cost of the party = $656
Total cost of food for each person = $95 + $12.75 = $107.75

Number of people at the party can be obtained from; Total cost of food at the party/ Total cost of each plate of food

= $656/ $107.75 = 6 persons

Learn more about arithmetic: brainly.com/question/2171130

3 0

2 years ago