Answer:
The proportion of the investment is 100%.
Explanation:
This can be calculated using the following formula:
Rportfolio = (y * Rrisky) + ((1 - y) * Ttbill) ..................... (1)
Where;
Rportfolio = Overall portfolio expected rate of return = 15%. or 0.15
Rrisky = risky portfolio expected rate of return = 15%, or 0.15
Ttbill = T-bill rate = 10%, or 0.10
Substituting the values into equation (1) and solve for y, we have:
0.15 = (y * 0.15) + ((1 - y) * 0.10)
0.15 = 0.15y + 0.10(1 - y)
0.15 = 0.15y + 0.10 - 0.10y
0.15 - 0.10 = 0.15y - 0.10y
0.05 = 0.05y
y = 0.05 / 0.05
y = 1.00, or 100%
Therefore, the proportion of the investment is 100%.
Answer:
Decision on the margins
Explanation:
Pool time seems to be having a greater effect at the moment, it makes sense for his to spend a bit more time in the pool and a bit less time on the bike.
However, this does not mean that it makes sense for her to spend all his time in the pool and no time on the bike. If he cut out all training on the bike, the value of a little bit of bike training might be higher than the value of the last hour of pool training. Dimitri does not treat biking versus swimming as an all-or-nothing decision. He makes small changes at the margin in the number of hours spent training for each activity.
Also they both realise that his time is fixed (20hrs) and anytime he wants to spend extra on one activit, is time he cannot spend on another (opportunity cost).
They are both trying to improve Dimitri's total time (exploiting opportunities to makes themselves better off).
An assumption that Dimitri realises that as he spends more time in the pool improving his swim time, his run and cycle times will suffer. As he swims more, his improvement is likely to slow down, while spending less time on cycling and running will cost him progressively more in terms of time.
Conclusion Dimitri is looking at the margins. His wife on the other hand, is not, she is ignoring the interaction, may be forgetting the decreasing improvements in swim and increasing deterioration in the other 2 legs.
Answer: Option A
Explanation: In simple words, it refers to the pricing strategy in which the firm initially charge a lower price of product to attract the customers and make a strong position in the market.
Hence it is effective only on those markets where the customer gives value to price more than the quality and assurance he is getting from the existing product.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the correct option is A.
A manager who tells a subordinate that he will not recommend her for promotion unless she supports his proposal in an upcoming sales meeting is using Coercion type of political behavior.
<h3>What is Coercion behaviour?</h3>
- Coercion is the use of threats, especially physical threats, to induce an unwilling action from a party.
- It entails a series of coercive behaviors that go against an individual's free will in an effort to elicit the desired response.
- Extortion, blackmail, or even torture and sexual assault are examples of these activities.
- Coercion occurs when someone is threatened with violence if they refuse to sign a contract.
Elements of Coercive Practices Proof
- Damaging, endangering, or threatening to harm.
- Both directly and indirectly.
- Any party or that party's property.
- Unfairly sway a party's course of action.
Learn more about coercion here:
brainly.com/question/14292154
#SPJ4
Answer:
Economic costs include both explicit costs and implicit costs.
Explanation:
- In economics, costs can be in the form of explicit and implicit as implicit costs are opportunity costs and are opportunities for engaging in business. While the explicit costs are accounting costs which are involved in the production of raw matter, wages etc.