Answer:
Its action would be optimal given an ordering cost of $28.31 per order
Explanation:
According to the given data we have the following:
economic order quantity, EOQ= 55 units
annual demand, D=235
holding cost per one unit per year, H=40%×$11=$4.4
ordering cost, S=?
In order to calculate the ordering cost we would have to use the following formula:
EOQ=√(<u>2×D×S)</u>
(H)
Hence, S=<u>(EOQ)∧2×H</u>
2×D
S=<u>(55)∧2×4.4</u>
2×235
S=<u>13,310</u>
470
S=$28.31
Its action would be optimal given an ordering cost of $28.31 per order
Answer:
It is more profitable to continue processing.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
A company has inventory that cost $50,000. Its scrap value is $65,000. The inventory could be sold for $150,000 if manufactured further at an additional cost of $80,000.
Sell for scrap= 65,000 - 50,000= 15,000
Continue processing= 150,000 - 80,000 - 50,000= 20,000
Answer:
Stronger
Explanation:
Given that inflation affects trade flows, as the higher price of commodities have negative impacts on exports rates. Thus, all things being equal, it is expected that high inflation should cause downward pressure on the exchanger rate of Krendo.
Hence, the inflation effect will be STRONGER than the interest rate effect in influencing the exchanger rate of Krendo against the U.S. dollar.
Answer:
If you don't trust the other party, you can't resolve conflict with them. You may even come to an agreement but without trust, you won't stick to it. ... In negotiations, parties who trust each other are more likely to cooperate and reveal information that may risk vulnerability.
Answer:
$53,700
Explanation:
Direct manufacturing cost = (Direct material per unit + Direct labor per unit) * Units produced
=($5.20 + $3.75) * 6,000 units
=$8.95 * 6,000
=$53,700
The total amount of direct manufacturing cost incurred is closest to $53,700
