1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aivan3 [116]
4 years ago
13

Why is Attila the Hun a controversial historical figure? A. Historians don’t know much about the origin of the Huns. B. Although

he could be cruel and savage, he was also a just and fair leader. C. Attila negotiated a treaty with the Roman Empire but later broke it. D. Historians believe that he is a myth rather than a real historical person.
History
1 answer:
Levart [38]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The correct answer is:

Historians believe that he is a myth rather than a real historical person.

Attila the Hun Attila the Hun (405-453), also sometimes known with the nickname as Attila the Scourge of God (Flagellum Dei) or simply Attila was the most powerful king of the Huns. He reigned over what was then Europe's largest empire, from 434 until his death. His empire stretched from Germany and the Netherlands to the Ural river and from the Danube River to Poland and Estonia. During his rule, he was among the most dire of the Western and Eastern Roman Empire's enemies: he invaded the Balkans twice and besieged Constantinople in the second invasion; he marched through Gaul (modern day France) as far as Orleans before being defeated at the Battle of Chalons; and he drove the western emperor Valentinian III from his capital at Ravenna in 452. He was regarded as sacker of cities. In the year 453 Attilla was at his wedding party,got drunk,hit his head,and chocked on his own blood this is how Attilla died a terrible and unfair death.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What 3 countries together became known as the Triple Alliance
d1i1m1o1n [39]

the Triple Entente - France, Russia, and Great Britain.Jun 30, 2014

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. How were the 1950s a breath of fresh air for most white Americans?​
Gekata [30.6K]

Answer:

In a new poll released by the Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) on Tuesday, a whopping 43 percent of Americans told researchers that discrimination against whites has become as large a problem as discrimination against blacks and other minority groups. And an even bigger share of Americans — 53 percent — told pollsters American culture and "way of life" have mostly changed for the worse since 1950.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Which of the following best describes the relationship between the enlightenment of the 17th and 18th centuries and latin americ
Svetach [21]

Answer:

A new view of nature emrged and it is C

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were the wigwams of the Algonquin people different from the pyramids in ancient Egypt?
erastova [34]
Where answers B, C and D have inaccuracies in one or more parts, answer A is the only correct answer.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Did the supreme court decisions under john marshall's leadership extend federal power too much? is it appropriate that someone w
mash [69]

The supreme court decision under John Marshall leadership have extended federal powers, but not too much in the sense of destroying the federalist idea that brought the United States together. Marshall was guided by a strong commitment to judicial power and by a belief in the supremacy of national over state legislatures. His judicial vision was very much in keeping with the Federalist political program in line with the constitution.

It can be argued that someone not elected should not have power to shape government and law through the Expansion of the Judiciary in 1801, but the Marshall Court, and this decision in particular, established the principle of "judicial review" whereby Congressional laws and executive actions may be judged by the Supreme Court to be within the bounds of the Constitution.

It is definitely not appropriate that a political party ideology is implemented through the judiciary, however, In keeping with John Marshall's Federalist views, they generally favored strong government action and especially supported the supremacy of the federal government over state authorities as long as it was constitutional.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • HELP PLEEEEASE What was the ultimate result of Zheng He’s voyages of discovery in the 1400s? a. expanding China’s overseas trade
    15·2 answers
  • What were some of the preparations lewis and clark made before they began their expedition?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the membership of a joint committee, such as the Joint Economic Committee?. A. minority pa
    5·2 answers
  • What were the main duties of midwives?
    6·2 answers
  • In what way did the United States fight world war 2 on multiple fronts
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following commoditities is a good
    12·1 answer
  • What might prompt the russian government to censor a news story
    11·2 answers
  • Were the demands of the austria hungarian empire on serbia fair?
    12·1 answer
  • How are patterns of global food distribution affected by political systems, infrastructure, and patterns
    15·1 answer
  • What was Ilbet Bill and why was it reserved
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!