1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aleksandr [31]
3 years ago
14

How did the conquistadors justify their conquest of the Aztec and Inca empire's?

History
2 answers:
murzikaleks [220]3 years ago
4 0
Here is what I got...
Aztecs was conquer by Herman Cortes. He became rich by acquiring plantations and gold mine. The Incas were defeated by Franciso Pizzaro. The conquistador were motivated by their religious faith and by loyalty to their monarch.
Hope this helped :)
Vikentia [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

<h2>They justify it with <em>''to preach God's word among them''.</em></h2>

Explanation:

Religion was the justification, but their motivation was the Gold and ''infinite wealth''. When first european arrive they saw that gold was everyone, but our natives didn't value that metal in an economical way, because they used it to worship gods.

But, the European point of view was Gold = Power. So, they enter in our lands seeking gold.

You might be interested in
The speech excerpt above outlines part of President Wilson's plan for peace following World War I. What was Wilson's plan for pe
Phantasy [73]
Woodrow Wilson's plan for peace was called Fourteen Points.
6 0
3 years ago
Which statements accurately describe factors that were part of the decline of the Aztec Empire?
natulia [17]
The answer is b,c,d. I hope this helps someone.
6 0
3 years ago
Which part of government is least inuenced by lobbying and political pressure?
xxMikexx [17]

Answer:

1 executive branch of the United States Gov-ernment

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
35 POINTS! Do you think Brown v. Board of Education (1954) served its purpose of societal desegregation well? Or, do you think t
marusya05 [52]
It did in the long run. In the short run it created many issues because there was a rise in extremism, in southern states especially. For starters, racists didn't want to desegregate their schools and public places so they didn't enforce the decision of the court throughout the entire next decade. Another thing is that organizations that were illegal like the Ku Klux Klan started getting power and harassing innocent African-Americans. It did create a litigious environment however because suddenly there were many more cases regarding desegregation and they had the court's precedence support so they were easily won because of the way the legal system works. It didn't lack legal justification, the only problem was enforcing it before the civil rights acts were passed and the country started battling racism systematically in all of the United States.
5 0
3 years ago
Need help !! Please help
SashulF [63]

Answer:

what do you need help with

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were the policies of thatcherism
    5·1 answer
  • What questions can I ask about Christopher Columbus, Letter to Lord Raphael Sanchez!?
    11·1 answer
  • Which Mongol leader built enormous ships and welcomed traders to China's ports, bringing people from all parts of the world and
    14·2 answers
  • Based on their domestic record, who was the most effective Roosevelt, Taft, or Wilson? Why?
    12·1 answer
  • Where was the Muslim empire of khwarazm
    5·2 answers
  • Is it possible for a non white man to carry the whiteman burden
    12·1 answer
  • Which themes guided renaissance thought
    12·1 answer
  • What role did merchants from Venice, Italy, play in the decline of the Byzantine Empire?
    7·1 answer
  • Why does the video mention that an attack may come at anytime
    5·1 answer
  • According to the ancient greeks, what came first in all creation
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!