Some experts believe that early childhood education programs should focus on both cognitive development and socio-emotional development in order to meet all of a child's needs.
<h3><u>What is socio-emotional development?</u></h3>
- The child's ability to build positive and fulfilling relationships with others as well as their emotional experience, expression, and control are all part of social-emotional development.
- Both internal and external processes are part of it.
- The five fundamental abilities that make up social and emotional learning in schools are self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills, and responsible decision-making.
- These competencies are regarded as the cornerstone upon which all other relationship competencies can be constructed.
- Here are some examples of how social and emotional skills are put to use: seeing someone else is unhappy and asking them if they're okay.
- Comprehending one's own ideas and feelings as well as the capacity to relate to others, and expressing oneself in various ways with friends than with parents.
Therefore, experts think that early childhood education programs should emphasize both cognitive development and socio-emotional development in order to address all of a child's requirements.
To know more on social-emotional development, refer to:
brainly.com/question/14477595
#SPJ4
They responded with terror because they wanted freedom of religion
Paul of Tarsus was a slave to Christ and James the half brother of Christ warned of the love of riches or mammon
In today's labor force, workers indeed are waiting longer to retire - a.
The reason for this is the fact that people are living longer and the population is aging. With it, this brings together the fact that people simply are not able to work up to the same age as they used to.
Answer:
Explanation:
"No taxation without representation!" was the cry. The colonists were not merely griping about the Sugar Act and the Stamp Act. They intended to place actions behind their words. One thing was clear — no colony acting alone could effectively convey a message to the king and Parliament. The appeals to Parliament by the individual legislatures had been ignored. It was James Otis who suggested an intercolonial conference to agree on a united course of action. With that, the STAMP ACT CONGRESS convened in New York in October 1765.
The Congress seemed at first to be an abject failure. In the first place, only nine of the colonies sent delegates. Georgia, North Carolina, New Hampshire, and the all-important Virginia were not present. The Congress became quickly divided between radicals and moderates. The moderates would hold sway at this time. Only an extreme few believed in stronger measures against Britain than articulating the principle of no taxation without representation. This became the spirit of the STAMP ACT RESOLVES. The Congress humbly acknowledged Parliament's right to make laws in the colonies. Only the issue of taxation was disputed.
Colonial and personal differences already began to surface. A representative from New Jersey stormed out during the proceedings. The president of the Congress, TIMOTHY RUGGLES of Massachusetts, refused to sign the Stamp Act Resolves. In the end, however, the spirit of the Congress prevailed. Every colonial legislature except one approved the Stamp Act Resolves.