Answer:
Gross Domestic Products (GDP) is a measure of the total market value of all finished goods and services made within a country during a specific period.
Explanation:
GDP is an acronym for Gross Domestic Products (GDP) and it can be defined as a measure of the total market value of all finished goods and services made within a country during a specific period.
Simply stated, GDP is a measure of the total income of all individuals in an economy and the total expenses incurred on the economy's output of goods and services in a particular country.
On a related note, Gross Domestic Products (GDP) is a measure of the production levels of any nation.
Basically, the four (4) major expenditure categories of GDP are;
I. Consumption (C).
II. Investment (I).
III. Government purchases (G).
IV. Net exports (N).
In conclusion, GDP is a measure of the total amount of finished goods and services produced by a country.
Hey there!
The phrase “laissez-faire” means “Let it be” originally but in the choices you provided In your answers above the closes to it would mostly be ‘to let be’ would be your answer
Answer: B. To let be
Good luck on your assignment and enjoy your day
~LoveYourselfFirst:)
Answer:
Option A. Liable, because notice to Emmett is notice to Fridley.
Explanation:
The reason is that the principle is liable for the outcome of the Emmett actions in the principle's behalf. So it is clear that Fridley is liable. The agent have to work in the best interest of its principal which means that the failure to notify the additional tax liability to Fridley was part of agent's fiduciary duty. This means that the principle can sue its agent for the consequences of not placing the sufficient care to its principle.
The Fridley is also responsible because Emmett is acting as Fridley which means the notice to Emmett is actually notice to Fridley.
Answer:
If we made the assumption that both countries had a per capita of $15,000 in 1960, country A, which entered an era of political stability, and applied liberal reforms, growing at a rate of 5%, would double its GDP per capita by 1975, reaching a GDP per capita of $31,183.92.
On the contrary, country B, which continued to grow by 1% per year, would only double its GDP per capita by 2030, reaching a figure of $30,101.45.
Therefore, it would take 55 years more for country B to double its per capita GDP level compared to country A.
