Is the given conjecture a valid rule for the following sequence? If not, give a counterexample. Sequence: 1, 2, 3, 6, 18, 108, .
.. Conjecture: Multiply the previous 2 terms to get the next term
2 answers:
A counterexample is seen in the third term, 3, which does not equal 1*2=2.
1*2=2 NOT 3
<span>No; 3 is a counterexample. is what i got
</span>
You might be interested in
Answer:
66
Step-by-step explanation:
because if you ad 60 and 6 it makes yes
50 divided by 40 equals 1.25! So the car is going 1.25 mph
Da answer is cCbecause it is
