The overturning of the "Separate but equal doctrine" was considered a major move towards ending the racial caste system in the United States. Thus, Option D is the correct statement.
<h3>Why was the "separate but equal" doctrine rejected?</h3>
The Supreme Court overturned decades of law when it ruled that the country's laws prohibiting equal access to racially-based education violated an equal protection provision of Article 14.
Thus, The overturning of the "Separate but equal doctrine" was considered a major move towards ending the racial caste system in the United States. Option D is the correct statement.
Learn more about "separate but equal" here:
brainly.com/question/16995413
#SPJ1
The correct answer would be option B, Social Loafing.
Amanda ends up getting the same grade as the other group members. This is an example of Social Loafing.
Explanation:
When people work in group, the individuals usually exert less effort as compared to the effort they put if they work alone. This phenomenon is called as the Social Loafing.
In Social Loafing, people working in groups are more dependent upon others and feel less responsibility of work. They share less efforts and seek equal reward. That is why, group's efficiency is usually seen low.
So when Amanda put least effort in the completion of the project and got the same grades as of the other group members, this is called as Social Loafing.
Learn more about Social Loafing at:
brainly.com/question/8001474
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer: "parapraxis" ; or "Freudian slip" .
________________________________________________
<span>Free Enterprise System is another name for market economy, also known as capitalism, where people are free to become entrepreneurs and own and operate an enterprise (business).</span>
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
Insanity plea or insanity defense is a plea made by the defendant in criminal courts that at the time of committing the crime he/she was not mentally stable. Though the defendant acknowledges his/her crime but pleads insanity which states that the person did not know or was not able to differentiate between right or wrong while committing the crime.
<u>From the given options, the statement of the defense attorney to plead insanity would be D. In that option, the reason that Wilson was psychotic thus unable to differentiate between right or wrong matches the criteria of insanity plea</u>.
So, the correct answer is option D.
