Nearly every american city struggled to pay its bills in the 1970s because of the continuing process of sub-urbanization.
hope this helps, God bless!
The answer if this would b A because there would be a lot of kids
Couldn’t find a direct answer, but D seems the most logical to me.
Hope this helps.
I’ll give you two:
Yes: The “War” on the Indians was not a traditional war of declaration but of skirmishes. When wagon trains of people headed West Indians would commonly target them for raids and pillage, so along many routes forts where built and patrols would try and make sure they were safe. If the problem became worse the local garrison would find the tribe and come with a list of demands. Most of the time they were fired upon arrival out of fear or anger. This would lead to a small battle or skirmish which would likely cause collateral damage.
No: The wars raged in the west against the Indians were that of near genocide, and to call it anything but is misleading. To claim that the slaughter of hundreds of innocent people was a “battle” is absurd and shouldn’t be considered. Though in films that depict such events are dramatized and inaccurate, situations much like those were taking place around the west yearly.
Answer:
Because it stopped further Ottoman spreading in Central and Western Europe.
Explanation:
Suleiman is regarded as the greatest of the Ottoman sultans. Since he arrived on the throne, he managed to spread his country. In 1521 he conquered Belgrade, and after the battle of Mohacs he managed to open the door towards the capital of Habsburg Monarchy.
Still, as he didn't managed to conquer the capital, he had to retreat. His failure to capture Vienna, prevented the Ottomans to spread their domain across the Europe.
