Answer:
False
Explanation:
I did it on edgnuity also i got it right
Good things:
It is a solid material,NOT plated which makes it easily engravable.
does not tarnish or
discolor easily
Bad things:
It is not a high quality metal
It will melt at low temperatures,so do not get it around extreme heat.
It can damage easy if exposed to acids like lemon juice or vinager
Answer B: Asymmetric cryptography, because the receiver has its own decryption key and cannot create encrypted messages, because he doesn't have the encryption key.
About the other answers:
A: Private keys are always involved, there has to be some secret to do encryption, so this answer doesn't say very much.
C: Digital signatures can be used to verify/prove some data comes from some person (the signer) in an unaltered way. It is not about encryption, so is not about the security of your message. You use it in combination with encryption.
D: Like A, this doesn't say very much. Shared secret keys (symmetric keys) can be used for encryption, but they are less secure since the keys have to exist in more than one place (sender and receiver).
A belief is an attitude that something is the case, or that some proposition about the world is true.[1] In epistemology, philosophers use the term "belief" to refer to attitudes about the world which can be either true or false.[2] To believe something is to take it to be true; for instance, to believe that snow is white is comparable to accepting the truth of the proposition "snow is white". However, holding a belief does not require active introspection. For example, few carefully consider whether or not the sun will rise tomorrow, simply assuming that it will. Moreover, beliefs need not be occurrent (e.g. a person actively thinking "snow is white"), but can instead be dispositional (e.g. a person who if asked about the color of snow would assert "snow is white").[2]
There are various different ways that contemporary philosophers have tried to describe beliefs, including as representations of ways that the world could be (Jerry Fodor), as dispositions to act as if certain things are true (Roderick Chisholm), as interpretive schemes for making sense of someone's actions (Daniel Dennett and Donald Davidson), or as mental states that fill a particular function (Hilary Putnam).[2] Some have also attempted to offer significant revisions to our notion of belief, including eliminativists about belief who argue that there is no phenomenon in the natural world which corresponds to our folk psychological concept of belief (Paul Churchland) and formal epistemologists who aim to replace our bivalent notion of belief ("either we have a belief or we don't have a belief") with the more permissive, probabilistic notion of credence ("there is an entire spectrum of degrees of belief, not a simple dichotomy between belief and non-belief").[2][3]
Beliefs are the subject of various important philosophical debates. Notable examples include: "What is the rational way to revise one's beliefs when presented with various sorts of evidence?"; "Is the content of our beliefs entirely determined by our mental states, or do the relevant facts have any bearing on our beliefs (e.g. if I believe that I'm holding a glass of water, is the non-mental fact that water is H2O part of the content of that belief)?"; "How fine-grained or coarse-grained are our beliefs?"; and "Must it be possible for a belief to be expressible in language, or are there non-linguistic beliefs?".[2]
