Answer:
B. No fallacy
Explanation:
First of, we need to know what a fallacy is. A fallacy is a mistaken belief, especially one based on unsound arguments.
A sound argument is an argument in which the truth in the premises are used to deduce the conclusions. While an unsound argument, makes use of premises that are not true.
With these, we can determine if the argument in the question was a sound argument. If it was, it won't be fallacious.
There is truth in the fact that the slim tea made Barbara loose 15 pounds after taking it for the stated period of time.
Therefore, concluding that someone with the same buildup as Barbara will have the same results, after taking the tea for the same period of time, is logical and not fallacious. This is because the premise is a true fact that has been tested, and the conclusion was drawn from the true premise.
This makes the argument a sound argument, with no fallacy
<span>Committee Action: When a bill reaches a committee it is placed on the committee's calendar. A bill can be referred to a subcommittee or considered by the committee as a whole. It is at this point that a bill is examined carefully and its chances for passage are determined. If the committee does not act on a bill, it is the equivalent of killing it. The Committee Chair has the right to "pigeonhole" (not assign or hear debate on the bill) thus killing it.</span>
Jot down ,because it gives you a visual of what you are doing before you movie to the final draft.
This might not be the right one but I think its the first one...........................
Answer:
Differential susceptibility
Explanation:
<u>Differential suceptibility refers to the idea that people can react very differently to the generally expected outcome.</u> When it comes to health, lifestyle choices and living conditions aren't often enough to explain outcomes, as people are born with different susceptibility to different ailments. In this example, Aaron was born with a bigger susceptibility to diabetes. This meant that even though he led a healthier lifestyle, he still developed diabetes. Meanwhile, Clement had a natural resilience, so even though he didn't take care of himself, he didn't get diabetes.
