<span>Kings at the time usually didn't have heirs to the throne, because of this by killing the king you bring confusion to the country. No one knows what to do and everyone wants to be the new leader. So the king dying was a great chance for Alexander to take over Persia....... HOPE IT HELPS</span>
Answer: Occupational crimes
Explanation: Occupational crimes which are also called workplace crimes can be simply refered to as wrongdoings by people over the course of their work or employment. For example, you work as a typist at a university examination office and an exam question was submitted by a lecturer . Going through the paper, you realized that it is one of the exams to written by your friend the following day and you quickly rush home to tell him about the questions submitted by the lecturer. You might have done this because you want your friend to study that particular question prior to him sitting for the exams so that he can pass with flying colors but then you have committed a workplace crime/ occupational crime.
Based on the scenario above, you should focus more your
efforts in regards to empathic listening by which empathic listening is a way
of performing an active listening in a way of listening and responding to a
person that likely improves trust and mutual understanding.
Answer:
In reality drinking 2 beers does not have much of an impact on reaction time, but researchers conclude from this experiment that drinking 2 beers significantly slows reaction time.
Explanation:
Hypothesis testing is used to test statistical significance of a mathematical proposition. Null Hypothesis is a neutral, no significance stating hypothesis. Alternate Hypothesis is a specific, significance stating hypothesis.
Null Hypothesis : Drinking 2 beers don't impact reaction time
Alternate Hypothesis : Drinking 2 beers impact (slows) reaction time
Type 1 Error is the rejection of an actually true null hypothesis. So, it implies that - In reality drinking 2 beers does not have much of an impact on reaction time, but researchers conclude from experiment that drinking 2 beers significantly slows reaction time.
Answer:
(a) Adam Smith - Believed that that in a capitalist, free-market system, all economic agents are coordinated under "the invisible hand", and this results in the benefit of all of them.
(b) Thomas Malthus - Believed that while increased food production rose standards of living, the effect was only temporary, because the same rise in food supply lead to a rise in population growth, and there would a time when there would be too many people to be fed. (the Malthusian Catastrophe).
(c) David Ricardo - He opposed mercantilism, and argued instead that unrestrained free trade benefited every nations. This is because of the concept of comparative advantage: under a free trade systems, nations would specialize in those industries they do best, and import anything that they do not produce.
