1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pochemuha
3 years ago
14

Read the passage below. Then answer the question that follow That on the first day of January, in the year of our Lord one thous

and eight hundred and sixty-three, all persons held as slaves within any State or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free; and the Executive Government of the United States, including the military and naval authority thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of such persons, and will do no act or acts to repress such persons, or any of them, in any efforts they may make for their actual freedom ...\
Why was this document written?

to free enslaved people
to issue orders to government officials
to declare that slavery was morally wrong
to punish rebellious slaves
History
1 answer:
Allisa [31]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

To free enslaved people

You might be interested in
N
umka2103 [35]

Answer: After serving as the commander of U.S. forces in Europe, Dwight D. Eisenhower became the supreme commander of the allied expeditionary force.

Dwight D. Eisenhower's experience, his knowledge of military strategy, persistence, determination, ability to persuade, mediate, and get along with people under his commands, led him to be appointed supreme commander of the Allied Expeditionary Force on December 24, 1943, after having served for more than a year as the commander of U.S. forces in Europe.

Eisenhower was successful in this position, he led several battles of the World War II that contributed to Germany surrender on May 1945.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which coordinates are closest to the capital city of Louisiana
Andrew [12]

Answer:

30.391830, -92.329102.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Did the U.S act alone when going to war in Iraq?
Kay [80]

he United States actively supported the Iraqi war effort by supplying the Iraqis with billions of dollars of credits, by providing U.S. military intelligence and advice to the Iraqis, and by closely monitoring third country arms sales to Iraq to make sure that Iraq had the military weaponry required.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does Jean Bodin define absolute rule?
sammy [17]

The writings of Jean Bodin provides us with an early theorisation of the idea of sovereignty even though the examples he uses are quite extensive. Essential to Bodin's notion of sovereignty is that the power the sovereign holds must be absolute and permanent. If a ruler holds absolute power for the duration of his life he can be said to be sovereign. In contrast, an elected official or some other person that holds limited powers can not be described to be sovereign. Although at times Bodin suggests that the people are sovereign, his definition of sovereignty as absolute, unlimited and enduring power points purposively towards a positive association of sovereignty and a singular monarchical, or even tyrannical, power.

Another qualification that Bodin introduces into the definition of sovereignty as absolute and perpetual is one that will become increasingly important in subsequent theorisations, culminating in the work of Carl Schmitt. For Bodin, a sovereign prince is one who is exempt from obedience to the laws of his predecessors and more importantly, those issued by himself. Sovereignty rests in being above, beyond or excepted from the law. Although it occupies a subordinate place in Bodin's theorisation, it could be said that this exception from being subject to the law is the quintessential condition of sovereignty in so far as it is understood politically.

Although for Bodin sovereignty is characterised by absolute and perpetual power he goes on to make a series of important qualifications to this concept. These come from two principle concerns. The first is real politics - Bodin seems to be aware that absolute power could licence behaviour injurious to sovereign authority. Hence for example a sovereign cannot and should not confiscate property nor break contractual agreements made with other sovereigns, estates nor private persons. The second reason is Bodin's underlying theological notion of divine authority and natural law. A sovereign may put aside civil law, but he must not question natural law (in which it appears right of property is sanctioned). Saying this, it is ultimately from this divine authority that the earthly right of sovereign power is legitimated. The prince literary does god's bidding, and yet by virtue of this can do wrong. Hopefully this helps out some :)

5 0
3 years ago
What was the result of the Mexican-American War?
Maurinko [17]
There was a treaty that gave them about 525,000 square miles of land
8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How were the political structures of the Jamestown and Plymouth colonies different?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following led directly to the formation of the Mongol empire? The unification of Mongol tribes by Termujin The kidn
    15·2 answers
  • What was an unintended consequence of Upton Sinclair's novel The Jungle?
    12·2 answers
  • Which statement describes America's response to the communist takeover in Russia? A. Attorney General Mitchell Palmer used the p
    14·2 answers
  • What was an enduring legacy of the anti-federalists? the belief that america would become more urban?
    13·1 answer
  • Which was a result of the introduction of the horse to North America by the Spanish? A. southern Indians no longer needed farm.
    8·2 answers
  • Who is called the "Father of the Constitution" because of his work at the
    13·2 answers
  • If you were able to vote today what would be the most important topics to you?
    8·2 answers
  • Can someone please help me with these
    11·1 answer
  • Agree or disagree. Property and the means of production should be owned by businesses and individuals
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!