All categories

3 years ago

What is the length of the hypotenuse of the triangle

Mathematics

2 answers:

user100 [1]3 years ago

6 0

Answer: i think the answers D.

Step-by-step explanation:

lorasvet [3.4K]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The correct option is 4.

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the Pythagoras theorem, the sum of squares of two legs of a triangle is equal to the square of the hypotenuse of the triangle.

$(hypotenuse)^2=(leg_1)^2+(leg_2)^2$

From the given figure it is clear that the length of one leg is 4 ft and the length of second leg is 7 ft.

Using Pythagoras theorem, we get

$(hypotenuse)^2=(4)^2+(7)^2$

$(hypotenuse)^2=16+49$

$(hypotenuse)^2=65$

Taking square root both the sides.

$hypotenuse=\sqrt{65}$

The length of the hypotenuse is √(65) ft . Therefore the correct option is 4.

You might be interested in

Which of the following inequalities have no solution over all real numbers? Check all that apply.

fiasKO [112]

Answer:

The answer is A, D, and E !

Step-by-step explanation:

just took this assignment, and got it right :)

7 0

3 years ago

Halpppp plsssssss i need help

serg [7]

<h2>Question:</h2>

Write an expression that can be used to find the sum of the most common and least common lengths of alien fingers.

<h2>Answer:</h2>

5 + 1 = 6

<h2>Step-by-step explanation:</h2>

(MCL) Most Common Length = 5

(LCL) Least Common Length = 1

MCL + LCL =

5 + 1 = 6

6 0

2 years ago

24 times 4 tons 2 pounds

Iteru [2.4K]

Ayy, so your question is kinda weirdly worded. But I think your asking what is 24 multiplied by 4 tons and 2 pounds.

Well, 2 pounds is equal to 0.00090718 tons.
There is a converter here: https://www.bing.com/search?q=pounds+to+tons&qs=AS&pq=pounds+to+tons&sc=8-14&sp=1&cvid=7BC591B75A8B4......

But now we have 0.00090718 tons as well as 4 tons. Add those together and you get 4.00090718. Now, multiply this by 24. You get: 96.02177232.

7 0

3 years ago

When given a graph, the vertical line test can be used to determine functionality. Describe the vertical line test and explain t

diamong [38]

Answer:

The vertical line test is a way for you to see if a graph represents a function. It allows you to identify if any x values have more than one y value.

A graph would be a function if every input (x) has exactly one output (y). A graph would not be a function if an input (x) has more than one output (y).

Step-by-step explanation:

In a function, every input within the domain of the function must have exactly one output. If the graph has an input that has more than one output, then it is not a function. The vertical line test is what allows you to see if a graph is a function or not.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Occasionally an airline will lose a bag. Suppose a small airline has found it can reasonably model the number of bags lost each

julia-pushkina [17]

Answer:

a) The probability that the airline will lose no bags next monday is 0.1108

b) The probability that the airline will lose 0,1, or 2 bags next Monday is 0.6227

c) I would recommend taking a Poisson model with mean 4.4 instead of a Poisson model with mean 2.2

Step-by-step explanation:

The probability mass function of X, for which we denote the amount of bags lost next monday is given by this formula

$P(X=k) = \frac{e^{-2.2} * {2.2}^k }{k!}$

$P(X=0) = \frac{e^{-2.2} * {2.2}^0 }{0!} = 0.1108$

The probability that the airline will lose no bags next monday is 0.1108.

b) Note that $P(X \in \{0,1,2\} = P(X=0) + P(X=1) + P(X=2)$ . And

$P(X=0)+P(X=1)+P(X=2) = e^{-2.2} * (1 + 2.2 + 2.2^2/2) = 0.6227$

Therefore, the probability that the airline will lose 0,1, or 2 bags next Monday is 0.6227.

c) If the double of flights are taken, then you at least should expect to loose a similar proportion in bags, because you will have more chances for a bag to be lost. WIth this in mind, we can correctly think that the average amount of bags that will be lost each day will double. Thus, i would double the mean of the Poisson model, in other words, i would take a Poisson model with mean 4.4, instead of 2.2.

6 0

3 years ago