Answer:
the low opportunity cost producer.
Explanation:
A person or nation has comparative advantage in production if it produces at a lower opportunity cost when compared with other countries or people.
For example, let's assume country x produces either 10 Apples or 5 oranges in 1 hour while country y produces either 20 Apples or 2 oranges in one hour. The opportunity cost for country x of producing apples and oranges are 0.5 and 2 respectively. While for country y, the oopportunity cost of producing apples and oranges are 0.1 and 10 respectively.
Country y has an opportunity cost and comparative advantage in the production of Apples while country x has a comparative advantage in production of oranges.
I hope my answer helps you
<em><u>If I had any advice for DreamWorks Classics, it would be to insist on adopting the 'organic' approach for internationalising Postman Pat.</u></em>
Explanation to the following is as follows;
Postman Pat chronicles the exploits of Pat Clifton, a postal worker for the Royal Mail in the imaginary community of Greendale. This product image is firmly ingrained in British habits and culture; therefore, it is unlikely that Postman Pat would have succeeded if they had followed the ‘born global' path when launching this cartoon.
Answer: A. True
Explanation: If he were inexperienced in this field or he was doing it as his hobby (casual objectives) with no goal to reproduce or add to the data already published, or were there people involved in his research, then this would have been categorized as informal research. However this setting is strictly formal, and authenticity of data is mandatory. Print and online journal articles contain the case studies already researched thoroughly.
<span>An allergic reaction should not be treated
lightly because this can actually result in death of the victim. So in this
casem this could actually lead to serious illness or death of the customer.
Which adds a very huge liability for the restaurant or organization.</span>
Answer:
b. $4,908,000
Explanation:
According to the FASB GAAP, the straight line method is used in this given question which is shown below:
= (Original cost - residual value) ÷ (useful life)
= ($40,900,000 - $4,090,000) ÷ (15 years)
= ($36,810,000) ÷ (15 years)
= $2,454,000
In this method, the depreciation is same for all the remaining useful life
For two years, the accumulated depreciation would be
= Annual year depreciation × number of years
= $2,454,000 × 2 years
= $4,908,000
