I think the answer is false
:):):):):):):)
I assume that the donut is very good
The project manager will outline how to transfer the deliverables in operational status and formally close the project at the phase 3 meeting. So, the correct option choice for this question would be option (b).
<h3>Write a short note on project management.</h3>
Project management may be regarded as the process of overseeing a team's activity to complete all project objectives within the established parameters. Usually, explanations of this information are included in the project documentation that is created at the beginning of the development process. Scope, budget and time are the three basic constraints. The other issue is how to best distribute the required inputs while still using them to accomplish predetermined objectives.
To deliver a finished product that satisfies the client's needs is the aim of project management. Modifying the client's brief to better effectively accomplish the client's aims is typically the goal of project management. Once the client's objectives are known, they should direct all other project members' decisions.
To know more about, project management, visit :
brainly.com/question/17313957
#SPJ4
Answer:
Liquidity
Explanation:
Liquidity is the degree to which an asset can be converted to cash. Assets that can easily be converted are described as liquid assets and include stocks and bonds.
Illiquid assets are not easy to sell. These assets may take a long time to sell or may be sold at a much cheaper price than the purchase price in order to make a quick sale. These include real estate, motor vehicles etc.
Since Intel has a history of effectively transforming
R&D investment into income, the pro-forma version of the ration seems to be
of more significant. A company starting, for instance, would be unalike: its
track record would be much poorer and probabilities are that the criteria set
in place would not be as rough as Intel’s. Therefore, it appears that the significance
hinge on the kind of business: if future benefit is more of a doubt, then
R&D should be expensed. The contradictory is true if benefit is almost certain.
Intel also has the advantage of being very vibrant with its R&D objectives
and having exact, measurable standards. They note obviously what the funds are apportioned
to and what the end outcomes should be of the growth.
