Answer:
put upward pressure on; put downward pressure on
- The actions of U.S. investors to lock in this higher foreign return would PUT UPWARD PRESSURE ON the currency's spot rate and PUT DOWNWARD PRESSURE ON the currency's futures price.
Explanation:
If both the spot and the forward price of a currency are the same, it means that it should be worth the same today than in the future. If you can earn higher interest by investing in that foreign currency, then investors will start purchasing higher amounts of the foreign in order to invest and gain higher rates.
Since the demand for the foreign currency increases, that put upward pressure its current price. Simply more investors will want to invest in that currency. While that happens right now, the market will tend to adjust to correct this arbitrage, and the way this can be adjusted is by lowering the future price of the currency. That puts downward pressure on the forward rate.
Answer:
many buyers and sellers
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this situation violates the perfect competition assumption of many buyers and sellers. This is a model that many buyers and sellers in a competitive market agree on a single market price, and that no individual has influence over the price. Therefore if a single company, like Dell in this scenario, is able to influence the price then it is violating this assumption.
Answer:
I got a joke for you :)
Why do we tell actors to “break a leg?”
Because every play has a cast.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The actual amount of the decrease in foreign investment is less than 100% therefore, if foreign investment fell by 100%, it would be cut in half. Apparently, a decrease of 200% means that it would be totally eliminated, and a decrease of more than 200% is impossible.The the statement does not mention the initial amount of foreign investment.
