1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gulaghasi [49]
3 years ago
5

The following transactions were completed by the company.

Business
1 answer:
Nana76 [90]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Since there is not enough room here, I used an excel spreadsheet to answer the question.

Assets increased by $8,440

Stockholders' equity increased by $8,440

Revenues increased by $8,440

Cash flows increased by $6,040

Explanation:

The accounting equation: Assets = Liabilities + Stockholders' Equity, basically represents how the double entry accounting system works. One side (assets) must always be equal to the other side (liabilities + stockholders' equity).

Download pdf
You might be interested in
Negative externalities that arise from the production of a gooda. cause an increase in the demand for the goodb. cause a decreas
Dennis_Churaev [7]

Answer:

The correct answer is option c.

Explanation:

Externalities refers to the situation in which costs or benefits arising from the activities of someone are incurred or  received by the some other third party.

Externalities can be classified into two types, namely, positive and negative.

In case of negative externalities the cost arising from the activities of some person are incurred by a third party.

Negative externalities lead to market failure.

6 0
3 years ago
A pegged exchange rate means the value of the currency is fixed relative to a reference currency
ruslelena [56]
Are you asking if it’s true or false?
5 0
3 years ago
15. If, in the economy described, government spending increases by $200 million, what will be the associated change in equilibri
iris [78.8K]

Answer:

$200 (million)

Explanation:

If the government spending increases by $200 million, then associated change in equilibrium income will be $ 200 million, assuming that Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) is 1

6 0
3 years ago
Instructions: Please make sure that you show all your work when solving the problems. Feel free to make any assumptions whenever
My name is Ann [436]

Answer:

Explanation:

From the given information:

The current price = \dfrac{Dividend(D_o) \times (1+ Growth  \ rate) }{\text{Cost of capital -Growth rate}}

15 = \dfrac{0.50 \times (1+ Growth rate)}{8\%-Growth rate}

15 \times (8 -Growth \  rate) = 0.50 +(0.50 \times growth  \  rate)

1.20 - (15 \times Growth \ rate) = 0.50 + (0.50 \times growth \ rate)

0.70 = (15 \times growth  \ rate) \\ \\ Growth  \ rate = \dfrac{0.70}{15.50} \\ \\ Growth  \ rate = 0.04516 \\ \\ Growth  \ rate \simeq 4.52\% \\ \\

2. The value of the stock  

Calculate the earnings at the end of  5 years:

Earnings (E_o) \times Dividend \  payout  \ ratio = Dividend (D_o) \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) \times 35\% = \$0.50 \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) =\dfrac{\$0.50}{35\%} \\ \\ = \$1.42857

Earnings (E_5) year \  5  = Earnings (E_o) \times (1 + Growth \ rate)^{no \ of \ years} \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \  5  = \$1.42857 \times (1 + 12\%)^5 \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \ 5  = \$2.51763

Terminal value year 5 = \dfrac{Earnings (E_5) \times (1+ Growth \ rate)}{Interest \ rate - Growth \ rate}

=\dfrac{\$2.51763\times (1+0.04516)}{8\%-0.04516}

=$75.526

Discount all potential future cash flows as follows to determine the stock's value:

\text{Value of stock today} =\bigg( \sum \limits ^{\text{no of years}}_{year =1} \dfrac{Dividend (D_o) \times 1 +Growth rate ) ^{\text{no of years}}}{(1+ interest rate )^{no\ of\ years} }

+ \dfrac{Terminal\ Value }{(1+interest \ rate )^{no \ of \ years}} \Bigg)

\implies \bigg(\dfrac{\$0.50\times (1 + 12\%)^1) }{(1+ 8\%)^{1} }+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^2 }{(1+8\% )^{2}}+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^3 }{(1+8\% )^{3}}  + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^4 }{(1+8\% )^{4}} + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^5 }{(1+8\% )^{5}} + \dfrac{\$75.526}{(1+8\% )^{5}} \bigg )

\implies \bigg(\dfrac{\$0.5600}{1.0800}+\dfrac{\$0.62720}{1.16640}+\dfrac{\$0.70246}{1.2597}+\dfrac{\$0.78676}{1.3605}+\dfrac{\$0.88117}{1.4693}+ \dfrac{\$75.526}{1.4693} \bigg)

=$ 54.1945

As a result, the analysts value the stock at $54.20, which is below their own estimates.

3. The value of the stock  

Calculate the earnings at the end of  5 years:

Earnings (E_o) \times Dividend payout ratio = Dividend (D_o) \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) \times 35\% = \$0.50 \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) =\dfrac{\$0.50}{35\%}\\ \\ = \$1.42857

Earnings (E_5) year  \ 5  = Earnings (E_o) \times (1 + Growth \ rate)^{no \ of \ years} \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year  \ 5  = \$1.42857 \times (1 + 12\%)^5 \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \  5  = \$2.51763 \\ \\

Terminal value year 5 =\dfrac{Earnings (E_5) \times (1+ Growth \ rate)\times dividend \ payout \ ratio}{Interest \ rate - Growth \ rate}

=\dfrac{\$2.51763\times (1+ 7 \%) \times 20\%}{8\%-7\%}

=$53.8773

Discount all potential cash flows as follows to determine the stock's value:

\text{Value of stock today} =\bigg( \sum \limits ^{\text{no of years}}_{year =1} \dfrac{Dividend (D_o) \times 1 + Growth rate ) ^{\text{no of years}}}{(1+ interest rate )^{no \ of\ years} }+ \dfrac{Terminal \ Value }{(1+interest \ rate )^{no \ of \ years }}   \bigg)

\implies \bigg( \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1 + 12\%)^1) }{(1+ 8\%)^{1} }+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^2 }{(1+8\% )^{2}}+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^3 }{(1+8\% )^{3}}  + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^4 }{(1+8\% )^{4}} + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^5 }{(1+8\% )^{5}} + \dfrac{\$53.8773}{(1+8\% )^{5}} \bigg)

\implies \bigg (\dfrac{\$0.5600}{1.0800}+\dfrac{\$0.62720}{1.16640}+\dfrac{\$0.70246}{1.2597}+\dfrac{\$0.78676}{1.3605}+\dfrac{\$0.88117}{1.4693}+ \dfrac{\$53.8773}{1.4693} \bigg)

=$39.460

As a result, the price is $39.460, and the other strategy would raise the value of the shareholders. Not this one, since paying a 100% dividend would result in a price of $54.20, which is higher than the current price.

Notice that the third question depicts the situation after 5 years, but the final decision will be the same since we are discounting in current terms. If compounding is used, the future value over 5 years is just the same as the first choice, which is the better option.

The presumption in the second portion is that after 5 years, the steady growth rate would be the same as measured in the first part (1).

8 0
3 years ago
What are the five C's of the marketing mix?
klemol [59]

Answer:

Company, Customers, Competitors, Collaborators, and Climate.

Explanation:

I belive that this is what you would like but if its not, just leave a comment and I'll try to help out.

If this is right, please leave a thank you or a Brainliest to help me out

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Maria wants to purchase a new computer and go to the Caribbean for spring break. The computer is priced at $1,299, and the vacat
    7·2 answers
  • Before 1860, most of the U.S. population lived _____ and most workers _____ .
    10·1 answer
  • Classical economists contend that official measures of unemployment: Multiple Choice understate the problem due to the existence
    14·1 answer
  • Risk vs reward sim
    13·1 answer
  • g Identify three human behavior trends found in 21st century organizations. From a management perspective, discuss why each tren
    15·1 answer
  • It is April 2018 and Mark is a novice investor who wants to decide between purchasing shares in EagleCorp or Myna Bird Inc. In f
    15·1 answer
  • HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    8·2 answers
  • Explain the difference between a depository institution and a non-depository institution.
    7·1 answer
  • Barton Industries expects next year's annual dividend, D1, to be $2.00 and it expects dividends to grow at a constant rate g = 4
    8·1 answer
  • Perhaps the most important reason that u.s. companies have moved industrial production abroad is?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!