Answer:
no gain or loss
Explanation:
<em>The amount of gain on the transaction is the difference between the sales value and the carrying value of the batting cages</em>
The carrying value of the batting cages as at when it was sold
<em>Carrying value= original cost - accumulated depreciatio</em>n
=310,000 - 260,000
= 50,000
<em>Gain/loss= sales value - carrying value</em>
= 50,000 -50,000
= $0
Answer: At the end of each of the next 5 years, you will deposit the following amount into your savings account: Year Cash Flow 1 $200 2 $300 3 $400 4 $200 5 $600 You expect interest rates to be higher in the future. Your best guess of what rates will be in the future is: Rate 1 year from now 10% Rate 2 years from now 11% Rate 3 years from now 12% Rate 4 years from now 13% If you forecast of interest rates is correct, how much money will you have 5 years from now
Explanation:
Answer:
Increment in yield by 5%, implies a GDP development rate by 5%, A higher development rate implies an expansion underway from its earlier year.
A higher GDP development could possibly have an effect on the nations of lower GDP development. It impacting power relies upon the assets that are held by a country. EX; Afghanistan GDP development rate is 22%, with 5.6% and US at - 2.6 %. Here, we can see that these provinces with higher GDP development rate can't settle on any effect on US choices. Except if they have, an asset which is rare in US.
Yield development by 5% implies an expansion underway; it doesn't really mean an increment in profitability.
Creation can be expanded in two different ways.
1) By utilizing more work inputs.
2) By expanding work efficiency. Utilizing more work units can't impact the way of life.
Since the compensation rate will be pretty much steady. Be that as it may, an expansion in labor efficiency will build the pay pace of the work, expanding the way of life. So. an expands yield can't ensure an expansion in way of life and it won't develop in the extent of 5%.Since way of life relies upon level of training, future, per-capita buying power equality.
I would fire them because they broke the clause and caused issues because of it
