Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

14

Which decade was marked by the emergence of "mass production" and "mass consumption"? A) the 1890's B) the 1920's C) the 1950's

D) the 1970's

2 answers:

Valentin [98]3 years ago

4 0

B) The 1920s mark the emergence of mass production and mass consumption

chubhunter [2.5K]3 years ago

3 0

the answer is B) the 1920's

You might be interested in

distinguish the freedoms guaranteed to african americans and other groups with the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments to the consti

creativ13 [48]

13th: abolished slavery

14th: due process and equal protection under the law.
the term "seprate but equal" came into play since racial segregation did not violate the 14th amendment.

15th: Granted african men to vote (women still couldnt vote at this time).
A new system came into play that involved people having to take literacy test or pay a tax to be able to vote which ended up still not allowing most african american men to vote.

3 0

3 years ago

50 POINTS! WILL MARK BRAINLIEST IF RIGHT!

kicyunya [14]

Answer: The battle of Little Bighorn occurred in 1876 and is commonly referred to as “Custer’s Last Stand”. The battle took place between the U.S. Cavalry and northern tribe Indians, including the Cheyenne, Sioux, and Arapaho. Prior to the battle of Little Bighorn in Montana, the tribal armies, under the direction of Sitting Bull, had decided to wage war against the whites for their refusal to stay off of tribal lands in the Black Hills. In the spring of 1876, Sitting Bull and his tribal army had successfully battled the U.S. Cavalry twice.

The U.S. Cavalry was attempting to force the Indians back to their reservations and divided into three columns to attack. One of the columns was led by Lt. General George Custer, who spotted a Sioux camp and decided to attack it. However, Indian forces outnumbered his troops three to one, and Custer and his troops were forced to reorganize. While waiting aid from the other Cavalry forces, another group of Indian forces, led by Crazy Horse, effectively trapped Custer and his men. In a desperate attempt to hold off the Indian warriors, Custer ordered his men to short their horses and stack their bodies to form a barricade to protect them from the Indians.

It took less than an hour for the arrows and bullets of the Indians to wipe out General Custer and his men. Despite having won this battle, the Indians were not victorious. Outrage over the death of the popular Custer led the U.S. government to redraw the boundaries of the Black Hills so that the land would not be part of reservation property, which left it open for white men to settle.

Explanation: hope this helps plz mark brainliest.

4 0

3 years ago

Cite evidence as you've read in many countries the chief of state reigns but does not rule. Cite evidence from your reading on t

Evgesh-ka [11]

There are different governmental systems in the world. Depending on them, there’ll be one or two figures that reign or rule. In Europe, there are mostly countries that have the Parlamental System, which the Parlament formed by deputies, senates, or even members from royal aristocracies, like the Lords in the United Kingdom, designate the ruler of the country.

This ruler is represented by the Prime Minister, who rules the countries. European Countries and Canada are good examples of this kind of system. One exclusive exception is Spain, which is ruled by a President elected by the Parliament. Spain is another example for which is called Parliamentalist Monarchy when a King or a Queen – in the UK’s case – reign the country.

In a Parliamentalist Monarchy, which is a Modern Monarchy first initialized in England in the XVII century, the monarch is pictured as a figure of power. They symbolize it but don’t have any prerogative to rule the country. In other words, they’re under-ruled by the Prime Minister and subject to the Parliament elected by the people. Other countries that use this kind of system are the Netherlands, Belgium, Sweden, Norway, etc. Countries like Liechtenstein are reigned by a Prince, and rule by a Prime Minister. Canada, Australia, and New Zealand are ruled by the Queen of the United Kingdom, but they have their respective Prime Ministers.

In France, Italy, Portugal, Germany, among others, have a President that reigns, but also a Prime Minister. Presidents are elected by the people, but they have a representative position, permitting to represent their countries in foreign meetings. In the homeland, they’re allowed to dissolute the parliament in case of people’s will. China also governs in this system, besides they have single-party politics.

In the USA and most of other Americas’ Countries, the governmental system is called Republicanism where a President rules and reigns the country. Their power is shared with the Parliaments, but they’re able to propose laws and sanction the ones ortogated by the Parliament. They represent the country, but also have decisive power in the national decisions.

3 0

3 years ago

Debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open and it may well include unpleasantly sharp attacks on gover

andrey2020 [161]

Answer: The freedom of speech protections in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

Explanation: New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the freedom of speech protections in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution restrict the ability of American public officials to sue for defamation. The Supreme court specifically held that if a plaintiff in a defamation lawsuit is a public official or person running for public office, not only must they prove the normal elements of defamation, they must also prove that the statement was made with "actual malice", meaning that the defendant either knew the statement was false or recklessly disregarded whether or not it was true.

The Court said it was necessary to protect the erroneous statements about public officials that would come up in free debate, otherwise critics of public officials will censor their speech for fear of potentially unlimited liability which could severely limit the information that could be given or published about the character of such officials.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Some famous Abolitionists are William Lloyd Garrison, Susan B. Anthony, John Brown, Harriet Tubman, and Frederick Douglass. Abra

SashulF [63]

Answer and Explanation:

The criminal harassment is an attempt to stop slavery in the United States. The early post-war generals, which occurred from about 1830 to 1870, compiled some of how Britain abolished slavery in Great Britain in the 1830s. The crusader, as his name implies, was the one who demanded the abolition of slavery in the land of 1900. Most notably, these were urgently needed by the freedom of all slaves. Many Americans, including former and former slaves, worked hard to support the gang. Offices in the world-famous brands include:

William Lloyd Garrison
Fredrick Douglass
John Brown
Harriet Tubman

Frederick Douglass - a former slave, known as Frederick Bailey when he was in slavery and who was the most famous blacksmith among the abolitionists - broke William Lloyd Garrison's novel, The Liberator, on his return to Great Britain and founded the Black rebellion book, The North Star.

After Sojourner Truth, Douglass, Delaney, and others wrote and spoke to end slavery, a former slave named Harriet Tubman, nee Harriet Ross, led the liberation movement. After escaping herself, she repeatedly went to Dixie to help others. Believing that he helped some 300 slaves to escape, he was known for warning his helpers that he would shoot any one of them because they would expose himself and others it helps.

5 0

4 years ago