Answer:
D.Inputs
Explanation:
According to the information provided in the statements of the question, the following data represents the option (D) " inputs ".
The reason for the data being input is that the given data is the information provided for the new employer records that will be entered in the employer's database.
Thus, this data will work as an input for the database.
Answer:
Option C.The payment made by Cordelia but not the payment made by Rupert.
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that Rupert did the right thing and as well follow the due process and custom of the country because he fills out the license paperwork and as well takes the license paperwork to the correct office in which he pays the front desk person the amount of $100 to process the paperwork while Cordelia on the other hand violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act reason been that due to the connections she had in that country she went ahead to schedules an appointment with the minister in charge of commerce because the minister has the authority to determine the foreign companies that can get licenses and she as well pays the minister the amount of $200 to approve their license.
Therefore based on the scenario we can vividly say that the payment made by Cordelia but not the payment made by Rupert violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
Answer: 12.1%
Explanation:
Returns are generally quoted in Nominal terms because they include the inflation of the period. The 12.1% is therefore the nominal yield on the stock.
When adjusted for inflation however, the stock return will most likely reduce to reflect the real rate of return which shows the rate of return without the effects of inflation that 'exaggerates' return.
The instrument that Shawn must use is “payable to the order of” before the name of the payee.
<h3>Requirements of Negotiability </h3>
- The first of the four major considerations is whether or not a paper is negotiable, and it is one that nonlawyers must address.
- Auditors, retailers, and financial institutions frequently handle notes and checks and must make quick decisions about negotiability.
- In a negotiable instrument, the only permissible promise or direction is to pay a particular sum of money. Any other promise or command renders negotiability null and void
- This restriction exists to prohibit an instrument from having an uncertain value.
- If the bearer of a negotiable instrument had to examine whether a provision or condition had been met before the thing had any value, the utility of the object as a substitute for money would be severely diminished.
Hence, the instrument that Shawn must use is “payable to the order of” before the name of the payee.
To learn more about the Negotiation instrument refer to:
brainly.com/question/9312091
#SPJ4
Answer:
C. Keiretsu
Explanation:
A means mistake proofing, b is a Japanese philosophy, d is a food, and e is wrong because it's still done in the 21st century.