Answer:
e. there is downward pressure on the price level, and the government may want to conduct expansionary fiscal policy.
Explanation:
At the time of boom in the economy, the unemployment rate is beneath than the rate i.e. natural also it gives rise to the growth of the economy, along with it the expenditures, consumer spending also increased that ultimately increased the disposable income.
This results in the upward movement in terms of pressure on the aggregate demand that leads to a rise in the level of price and the real GDP also rises which reduced the unemployment
But when the aggregate demand is less so there is a downward pressure on the price as the level of price declines so that the aggregate demand increased and it is requirement made by the government for an expansionary fiscal policy that give increased in government spending or taxes decreased in order to raise the aggregate demand
Answer:
31.47%
Explanation:
Total investment = 4000 + 3000 +9000 = $16,000
% of investment in A = 4000/16000 = 25%
% of investment in B = 3000/16000 = 18.75%
% of investment in Asset beta and risk-free asset = 100% - 25% -18.75% = 56.25%
Let the % of investment in asset with beta of 1.74 is A, % of investment in risk free asset is B.
We have the following simultaneous equations:
0.9 = (0.25 x 1.47) + (0.1875 x 0.54) + (A x 1.74) + (B x 0)
A+B = 56.25%
From the first equation, we get A = 24.78%
--> B = 56.25% - 24.78% = 31.47%
*** Note: Portfolio beta is the weighted sum of individual asset betas, according to the proportions of the investments in the portfolio
*** Note: Beta of risk free asset is 0
Answer:
The short-run aggregate supply curve slopes upward because of all of the following reasons except a. in the short run, as prices of final goods and services increase, some firms are very slow to adjust their prices, thus their sales increase. b. in the short run, an unexpected change in the price of an important resource can change the cost to firms.
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
C. To enforce property rights
Explanation:
Government intervention in market can be non materistically via regulation , materistically via taxes & subsidy.
Although the second materislistic way of tax, subsidy comes under the perview of 'Government Budget' .
Government budget is anual financial statement showing economy's expected revenue & expenditure .
Economic growth & stability by reallocation of resources , reducing income inequalities - reflect 'efficiency' & 'equity' as valid reasons .
Foreign protection is also not invalid depending upon the initial budding stage of a developing economy & its global stand. Eg - India 1950 to 1990 .
However all these are progressive legitimate reason for govt. Intervention .
But , enforcing property rights is a feature of 'socialistic (communistic) economy - which has its own demerits like loss of consumers soveireignity , lack of postive competitive efficiency , govt overburden.
Answer:
The correct answer is entrepreneurs are born, not made.
Explanation:
Entrepreneurs, social psychologists and economic theorists have speculated on whether entrepreneurs are born or made, in other words, if you are predisposed to become an entrepreneur because of your genetic constitution, or if that provision comes from your environment, conditioning or other external factor.
For most entrepreneurs, it is comforting to think that business men and women are made, that even if they lack the "right" DNA, practice, experience and sufficient conditioning to be a success.
