The best completes the diagram showing the connection between a Supreme Court case and civil liberties; Tinker v. Des Moines is students have the right to symbolic speech. Option A. This is further explained below.
<h3>What are rights?</h3>
Generally, rights are simply defined as anything which is right, just, or honorable from a moral standpoint.
In conclusion, The landmark Tinker v. Des Moines decision from the Supreme Court in 1969 established students' constitutionally protected right to free expression in public schools.
Read more about rights
brainly.com/question/10710431
#SPJ1
<span>Rehoboam rejected the appeal to him from the northern tribes and Jeroboam at Shechem to alleviate the oppressive measures instituted by Solomon.
false</span>
Answer:
The record of the Beale treasure story given in Ward's 1885 handout is a main story, and that the treasure in Bed ford Area, Virginia, was covered there by the amazing semi legitimate privateer, Jean Lafitte (Laffite).
I acknowledge that Lafitte had a treasure that he wished to hide.
There is no proof to recommend that Lafitte was keen on ensuring a treasure for his beneficiaries or for the beneficiaries of his men. Normally, he would wish to ensure such a treasure for himself and his family, however that could be taken care of without a requirement for a mind boggling plan to circulate the treasure to a named rundown of beneficiaries. Best case scenario, the treasure story could give a cover to clarify the treasure's birthplace, and hence give it authenticity.
Basically, quite a prepared story could be used as a way to "wash" Lafitte's amassed wealth.
There are even stories that the treasure was not deliberately hidden. A few records state that the treasure was ready one of Lafitte's vessels and sank to the sea floor after a wreck.
Explanation:
All through Lafitte's occasions as a bootlegger and privateer, he turned out to be exceptionally affluent. His treasure comprised of the cash he would get in return for his unfamiliar merchandise just as the treasures left on the vendor delivers that he caught.
It is as yet hazy why Lafitte needed to cover his treasure or even where he was most recently seen. A few antiquarians relate that Lafitte returned to an existence of wrongdoing, leaving the US no decision except for to seek after his capture. With the danger of detainment and the dread of being caught, Lafitte purportedly covered his treasure with the objective to by and by sidestep U.S. seizure and to return to it later.
Answer:
- tendency rates tripled , 1880-1890
- cotton was deflated , market was flooded
- whole time they planted they put the prices down
- Union blockaded the South so they couldn't get cotton
- England found a new place to get cotton for cheaper ( India ,Egypt and Brazil)
- the US had too much cotton it began to build up
hope it helps :)