He opposed it because he felt that it made the rich get richer and since he favored the common people and felt that it wasn't fair toward the common people .
With the regards to the statement that if not for Americans participating in WWI, Prohibition would not happen, this statement is <u>false</u>.
<h3>Why is this statement false?</h3>
The movement to enact prohibition was already growing strongly before the First World War broke out.
In fact, before the U.S. joined the war, those in support of Prohibition had majorities in the two houses of Congress. WWI was merely an event that sped up the rate of prohibition and without it, Prohibition would have still happened at a later stage.
Find out more on Prohibition at brainly.com/question/3814594.
Answer:
Option: The reform movement eliminated a major source of perceived corruption.
Explanation:
Martin Luther began a religious movement which led him to form the Protestant Reformation. He broke the link between the Catholic church and formed a new religion after seeing the corruption in it. The Catholic Church indulged in illegal means to acquire money from the people by selling "indulgences" to obtain salvation. Luther believed that the individual has to control whatever happens in life.
The answer would be the second option. The price of gasoline had gone done prior to this shift.
General Washington withdrew his troops to Pennsylvania.
i just took this test
