Mandy used the input and output in this table to write ratios. She concluded that because they are not all equivalent, this is n ot a proportional relationship. Is she correct? Explain. A 2-column table with 4 rows. Column 1 is labeled x with entries 1, 2, 5, 10. Column 2 is labeled y with entries 5, 10, 25, 50. 5 over 1 = 10 over 2 = 25 over 5 = 10 over 50 =
2 answers:
Answer:
No. The last ratio is not written with the values in the same position as the others. It should be 50
10
to be consistent. If the ratio were written this way, then the ratios would all be equivalent . The relationship is proportional.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
No. The last ratio is not written with the values in the same position as the others. It should be 50
10
to be consistent. If the ratio were written this way, then the ratios would all be equivalent . The relationship is proportional.
Step-by-step explanation:
I just did this!
You might be interested in
Answer: $536.40
Step-by-step explanation:
8.94 * 2 = 17.88
8.94(40) + 17.88(10)
357.60 + 178.80 = $536.40
Answer: B: 70, 80, 30
Step-by-step explanation:
An acute triangle has all 3 angles at less than 90 degrees, therefore the answer is B because its the only one that has all three at <90
Answer:
x² - y² and x^4 - 36
Step-by-step explanation:
(x + y)(x - y)
(x² + 6)(x² - 6)
Answer:
L=8
Step-by-step explanation:
S=smaller number
L=larger number
S+L=5 : S=5-L
L=14+2S
substitute for S:
L=14+2(5-L)
solve for L:
L=14+10-2L
3L=24
L=8
Answer:
im not sure about this one but i think its 2. 180ft squared
Step-by-step explanation:
