I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
The europeans brought infectuous diseses such as the bubonic plague, chicken pox, pneumonic plague, cholera, diphtheria, influenza, measles, scarlet fever, smallpox, typhus, tuberculosis, and whooping cough. The diseases introduced in the Americas by the Europeans were crowd diseases: that is, individuals who have once contracted the disease and survived become immune to the disease.
Companies like Walmart that assert a "more for less" strategy are using value-based pricing.
What is value-based pricing?
- Value-based pricing is a method of setting prices that is mostly based on how much a consumer thinks a product or service is worth.
- Value pricing is which means that businesses set their prices in accordance with what consumers think a product is worth.
- Value-based pricing differs from "cost-plus" pricing, which computes prices after taking manufacturing costs into account.
- Companies that provide distinctive or highly desirable products or services are better positioned to benefit from the value pricing model than those that sell primarily commoditized goods.
- The value-based pricing theory primarily applies in marketplaces where owning a product improves a customer's self-image or enables unmatched life experiences.
To learn more about Value-based pricing refer to:
brainly.com/question/17438199
#SPJ4
I think he had no right to privacy.
<u>Explanation:</u>
According to the law and order, with search warrant issued by court (head of the judiciary system) police has the power to search and seize any illegal work. Even when the convict caught in red hand police can take him under their custody up to the further proceedings through court.
Under this circumstances, no privacy work. Now depending upon the nature of crime decision will be taken. If any case convict issue anticipatory bail before the search operation he can relieve himself temporarily from the instant harassment.
The 19th century figure that is known for opening Japan to US trade is :
Mathew Perry
he was a commodore of United States navy that opened japan US Trade
hope this helps
