Answer:
Communism and Facism in principle are at direct odds with one another.
Explanation:
Communism in it's purest form would have the ultimate outcome of total equality among the people with no private ownership and really little to no government presence. In contrast, Facism in it's purest form is a complete authoritarian state with all power belonging to a central authority or dictator. What falters in each system is often dependent on a power struggle. Each system, along with other political systems, are based on haves and have nots, giving and taking, the aristocracy vs. the proliteriet, etc. In recent history, Facism tends to move towards socialistic or at least moderate ideals due to the complete oppression of the many. In the same way, Communism has struggled due to the existence of a hierarchy structure that often resembles fascism. The fascist components in a communist society often attempt to hide the fact that a fascist type authority exists.
The institutionalization of trade has been around since the "value theory" of David Ricardo in 1817, which argues that some countries had more feasible conditions to produce a better output of certain products in comparison to others. As a result, they had to engage in trade with other countries that had products they lacked.
"Labor" and "resources" are the key factors that fuel trade. As some countries have a cheaper labor force, it makes their products have competitive prices in the market. On the other hand, certain countries have scarce resources that many other countries do not have such as gold and other minerals. Therefore they have to engage in trade with the countries that extract them from their soil.
Answer:
The Simon Commission came to India in 1927 to generate a report on how well the 1919 Government of India Act was working. The Government of India Act established the new Indian constitution and Great Britain appointed British officials to the Simon Commission in order to oversee the effectiveness of the constitution.
Explanation:
