1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jekas [21]
3 years ago
5

How did immigration into the us from Europe change between 1820 and 1850

History
1 answer:
77julia77 [94]3 years ago
6 0
Hello.

<span>Immigration into the us from Europe change between 1820 and 1850 increased.

Most of the poplution became irish people that were cathloic.

Have a nice day</span>
You might be interested in
What did the Enabling Act do?
MAXImum [283]
<span>A. gave Hitler unlimited power for four years

</span><span>C. Germany</span>
6 0
3 years ago
How would you describe Lincoln’s plans for dealing with the South? Would you consider it a lenient policy or strict? Explain you
Zolol [24]
I would describe Lincoln's plans for the South as lenient. Lincoln wanted to welcome the South back into the Union, not by punishing the South by using strict laws. 
5 0
3 years ago
Discuss the importance of the Scientific Revolution and how it affected the early Enlightenment Movement?
Sidana [21]

Answer:

The European Enlightenment of the !8th century could not have happened without the previous, and concurrent, Scientific Revolution, and its technological discoveries and inventions, in the !7th and 18th centuries. The Scientific Revolution is the most important event in world history yet most people have never heard of it. A person is unable to understand the world around around them today without at least some basic knowledge of The Scientific Revolution.

There was a small group of philsophers (of the Enlightenment) who really understood that a new world was emerging in Europe in the human understanding of reality. They understood that Man was able to rationally explain Nature for the first time in human history. That God was not actually physically present in Nature. That God, therefore, might not actually exist at all (Atheism). That Man was now in control of Nature. That Man was no longer part of Nature; these were now two separate philosophical realms. That Man was above Nature, even God. And, the big one, the basis of the Enlightenment itself, that Man could remake the world using his rational thought (ideas) without any reference to European history, European tradition or Man as even part of Nature. In other words, wishful thinking born from the dangerous rationalisation of taking ideas to their logical conclusion without any reference to reality.

So, of course, the adoption of these “scorched Earth” or “Year Zero” ideas of the Enlightment was, and still is, a complete disaster for humanity. Especially when combined with the new controlling powers of Science and Technology. The Enlightentment led directly to the first emergence of Left wing politics - that Man is created purely through Nurture, not Nature, and is born as a “blank slate” - with no reference to our 200,000 years of evolutionary adaptation as part of Nature.

This distorted thinking, in turn, led eventually, to the disastrous political and social events of 1968, when even objectivity itself was jettisoned. And, then to the final post-Modern delusion that European culture, art and science is no better than even the most primitive tribes (blank slates) still living in the jungle today.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to harries and Harries, what were two reasons the espionage and sedition acts were passed?
dezoksy [38]

This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.

Read The Last Days of Innocence: America at War 1917–1918,  by Harries and Harries (Random House, 1997)

According to harries and Harries, what were two reasons the espionage and sedition acts were passed?

Answer:

The Espionage Act (1917) and the Sedition Act (1918) were enacted to grant the government more reliable means to control the information related to the word effort. On one hand, there was the need to control what citizens said publicly about the war, to make sure that messages that incite disloyalty don´t spread.

Explanation:

At the same time, it was important to safeguard sensitive information about the war preparations, so the government being able of suppressing dangerous publications revealing secret details about the war.

4 0
3 years ago
True or false pharaohs and other rulers exchanged envoys to maintain close ties
d1i1m1o1n [39]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Pharos were kings, Egyptian rulers

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was life like for most people?
    7·2 answers
  • Why do Australians love sport? please answer this!!
    6·2 answers
  • wwwww.w. wwww. e What was the primary cause of the fall of the Zhou dynasty? O Nomadic tribes formed alliances with feudal leade
    12·2 answers
  • Why is the change from hunting and gathering to
    6·2 answers
  • What’s it called when a government official is charged with misconduct
    12·1 answer
  • Please help I don't get this worksheet:)
    14·1 answer
  • Who were the wars that the punic wars went against?
    7·1 answer
  • How did Muslim leaders treat non-Muslims in the territories that they conquered?
    7·1 answer
  • When the days are cold and the cards all fold
    9·2 answers
  • Panuto: Punan ang Ladder Web ng mga naging
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!