Answer:
Hannibal made one major tactical error: He did not attack and capture Rome when he had the opportunity.
Hannibal conducted his operations in Italy not as one campaign in a larger war but as the only campaign in the only war. He seemed to hold to the conviction that if he won enough battles, he would win Italy. And if he won Italy, victory over the Roman people would be his. Battles are the means to a strategic end, not ends in themselves. Hannibal was a sworn enemy of the Romans and he let his emotions cloud out that fact when he launched the second Punic War. He could win every battle, but he did not apply those battles to wining the war.
There seemed to be some confusion between tactics and strategy in his mind. This caused him to commit a number of operational failures that led to his eventual defeat in Romes heartland.
The Carthaginian senate had failed to send him critical supplies and troops when most needed. He had severe logistical problems. Tactics win battles, logistics win wars. There was no good reason why supply transports could not have gotten through to Hannibal.
Moronically, Carthage’s strategic shift away from Italy after Cannae came at a time when Hannibal’s momentum was at its full. Cannae was an absolutely devastating defeat for the Romans. Politics.
Hannibal was eventually called back to Carthage because of the military failures of his compatriots. The Romans had pushed into Carthaginian territory, and they needed reinforcements.
Explanation:
Early mercantilism meant primarily aiming to reduce imports. This issue is related mainly to articles of luxury. The mercantilists believed fact that the foundation of the wealth of the state is a positive trade balance - the dominance of exports over imports. Source of such beliefs lay still in the medieval practice of governance - the monarchs gather financial reserves necessary for an effective policy. <span>However, in the developed theory of mercantilism, welfare of the residents and the strength of the state directly combined with the development of the industry. It is associated with it hopes for economic self-sufficiency of the country. In addition, the mercantilists preached direct relationship between economic power of the country's human potential.</span>
Montesquieu believed in a separation of powers. He believed some powers should go to the executive branch, some to the legislative, and some to the judicial.
Hope this helps!
No. They are tied together. If someone is considered less than equal to another person under the law, then that person will always be the so-called protected or higher person's slave. Human will to power is this way. Freedom (liberty) is ONLY possible when all people are considered equal to each other
