Answer: (E) It cannot be known whether it was nuclear deterrence that worked, or some other factor, such as a recognition of the economic value of remaining at peace.
Explanation:
The argument that a third world war between superpowers has not happened because nuclear weapons act as a deterrent infers that it could only be because of nuclear weapons that a war has not broken out yet there could be a number of other reasons this could be the case.
This therefore presents a flaw in the argument that needs to be further investigated and until we can definitively state that there weren't other factors involved, we cannot say with certainty that the peace between the Superpowers is only down to nuclear deterrence.
Answer:
1. glossary
2. table of contents
3. index
Explanation:
i did the question just so i could answer for y'all
Yes, because if it is not his/her self-interest they will not be able to work as hard as they can and won’t fully participate, while if they wanted to do it, they could go all out as it is something they want to achieve.
Facts are agreed-upon statements; theories are ideas.
<h3>Does a theory summarize and explain facts?</h3>
A theory not only explains known facts; it also allows scientists to make predictions of what they should observe if a theory is true. Scientific theories are testable. New evidence should be compatible with a theory. If it isn't, the theory is refined or rejected.
<h3>What is a theory statement?</h3>
A theoretical statement says something about the values of one or more variables, although it is generally thought of as expressing something about the relationship between two or more variables (e.g., “The more television a child sees, the more aggressive the child will act”).
Learn more about theory statement here:
<h3>
brainly.com/question/24075103</h3><h3 /><h3>#SPJ4</h3>
