1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ad libitum [116K]
3 years ago
7

Who are Georgia’s government officials? Find out here.

Social Studies
2 answers:
polet [3.4K]3 years ago
8 0

As of 2019, the current government of the State of Georgia stands in the following order:

Governor of the state of Georgia: Brian Kemp. He is the 83rd governor and succeded his predecessor, Nathan Deal, since 2019. Deal was the governor from 2011 to 2019.

Lieutenant governor: Geoff Duncan, also a Republican like the governor.

Attorney General: Chris Carr, Republican

Secretary of State: Brad Raffensperger.

These are the people who are now at the head of the State of Georgia as of January 14, 2019.

alekssr [168]3 years ago
7 0
Nathan Deal is the Governor
of Georgia.

The lieutenant governor of Georgia has been Casey Cagle since he was first elected in 2007.

Christopher M. Carr is the Attorney General, he was appointed by Nathan Deal.

Brian Kemp is Georgia’s Secretary of State.
You might be interested in
Which agreement was reached under the Great Compromise? A) that representation in Congress would be split into two houses B) tha
Vikentia [17]
A, that Congress would be split into two houses. This is the way Congress is now, split into the House of Representatives and the Senate.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Criticize the role of government in foreign employment​
ch4aika [34]

Answer:

<h3><em><u>The government should formulate the laws and policies required for foreign employment to overcome the challenges seen in the foreign employment and strictly implement it. ... The government should provide legal visa to the workers and punish those who intend to give illegal visa for foreign employment.</u></em></h3>

Explanation:

<h2><em><u>I</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>hope </u></em><em><u>U</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>lik</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>my</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>answer</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>and</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>my</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>answer </u></em><em><u>helped </u></em><em><u>U</u></em><em><u>.</u></em></h2>

3 0
3 years ago
How did the economic motives of imperialism change from the 14th - 18th century to the 19th century?
Angelina_Jolie [31]

Answer:

Various motives prompt empires to seek to expand their rule over other countries or territories. These include economic, exploratory, ethnocentric, political, and religious motives.

Explanation:

Economic: Imperial governments, and/or private companies under those governments, sought ways to maximize profits. Economic expansion demanded cheap labor, access to or control of markets to sell or buy products, and natural resources such as precious metals and land; governments have met these demands by hook (tribute) or by crook (plunder). After the advent of the Industrial Revolution, dependent colonies often provided to European factories and markets the raw materials they needed to manufacture products. Imperial merchants often established trading posts and warehouses, created transportation infrastructure, and sought control over strategic choke points, such as the Suez Canal in Egypt (which allows boats to cut thousands of miles of travel time between Asia and Europe). Imperial powers often competed with each over for the best potential resources, markets, and trade.

Exploratory: Imperial nations or their citizens wanted to explore territory that was, to them, unknown. Sometimes they did this for the purpose of medical or scientific research. At other times, they did it for the sense of adventure. Invariably, imperial explorers sought to discover, map, and claim territory before their imperial competition did, partly for national and personal glory and partly to serve the imperialist goal of expansion.

Ethnocentric: Imperial nations sometimes believed that their cultural values or beliefs were superior to other nations or groups. Imperial conquest, they believed, would bring successful culture to inferior people. In the late 19th century, for example, European powers clung to the racist belief that inferior races should be conquered in order to “civilize” them. The Europeans acted on their ethnocentrism, the belief that one race or nation is superior to others.

Political: Patriotism and growing imperial power spurred countries to compete with others for supremacy. It’s a matter of national pride, prestige and security. Empires sought strategic territory to ensure access for their navies and armies around the world. The empire must be defended and, better yet, expanded. Political motives were often triggered as responses to perceived threats to the security or prestige of the imperial power or its citizens abroad.

Religious: During imperial expansion, religious people sometimes set out to convert new members of their religion and, thus, their empire. Christian missionaries from Europe, for example, established churches in conquered territories during the nineteenth century. In doing so, they also spread Western cultural values. Typically, missionaries spread the imperial nation’s language through educational and religious interactions, although some missionaries helped to preserve indigenous languages. British missionaries led the charge to stop the slave trade in the nineteenth century, while others, such as French missionaries in Vietnam during the same time period, clamored for their country to take over a nation.

6 0
4 years ago
Which of the following does not today fit into any of the four categories of minor parties? A. the Know Nothing Party B. the Gre
xz_007 [3.2K]

The Green Party does not today fit into any of the four categories of minor parties.


6 0
4 years ago
According to the altman and taylor model, the dimension of self-disclosure where information shared moves from being impersonal
Roman55 [17]
The answer is <span>depth
</span>According to Altman and Taylor, Depth refers to the Details of various facets that every people have in our lives.
This includes the personal passion that a person have, the way he/she describes the relationship with the family, how is their biggest fear, etc.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Inequality is decreasing around the world while the world appears to globalize.<br> true of false?
    6·1 answer
  • Which trees are seen in Maracaibo? oak pine palm date
    5·1 answer
  • Examples of indirect discrimination
    10·1 answer
  • What kinds of cloth had a large market in europe
    8·1 answer
  • Leland and Abbey have been best friends for two years. Leland recently discovered that Abbey had been lying to her. Leland is co
    11·1 answer
  • Melinda has two younger sisters. Grace is the middle child, and Jennifer is the youngest.Which child would be MOST motivated to
    13·1 answer
  • What impact did the development of agriculture in early human settlements have on trade
    15·1 answer
  • In your opinion what can be done for nepal to develop make a list of suggestion<br>​
    11·2 answers
  • When one walks mindfully what do they become aware of?
    13·2 answers
  • Which year did memorial day officially begin to be celebrated on the last monday in may?.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!