To be reticent is to not reveal one's thoughts readily. In this case, it is the reticence of the author. The author does not reveal their thoughts readily. If the narrator or author refuses to do something, it is made known that he is doing something. The something here is him refusing. If he acts as if the situation is normal, I'd assume he is acting in such a way that would be nonreactionary of the actions from the provoker. I would safely choose the last option as sorrentino's exercising of authorial reticence.
<span>An Aristotelian is someone who believes that sense experiences will lead humans to obtain knowledge of *the eternal forms of things*
</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Amy Tan's point here is that her mother made herself perfectly understood even though her English was anything but good and pure.
I would pick the last choice
Answer:
where is the passage how do we know what to put the answer as if there is no passage
<span>I believe the correct
answer is the second statement – that anyone can understand and enjoy the books.</span>
In the second paragraph
of “Preface to Buddhism and Buddhists in China”, the idea that author is trying
to convey about the book, using descriptors like "not textbooks,"
"impressionistic," and "introductions" is that everyone can
enjoy and understand books as the purpose of each volume in this series is
impressionistic rather than definitely educational.
