The correct answer is A) Did the researches tried to find any common factor in its subjects that would influence both hours spent sitting and the likelihood of developing diabetes?
The other options of the question are B) Who pay for this research and what possible motivations would they have to skew the results in a way that would benefit them? C) What are the average mortality rates associated with diabetes and does this risk offset the benefits of sitting comfortably at work? D) How did the researchers measure how many hours the subject sits per day and what qualifies as an official diabetes diagnosis?
A new high-profile study reports a strong connection between how long people sit every day and how likely they are to develop diabetes. The question that best represents a critical examination of the research is " Did the researches tried to find any common factor in its subjects that would influence both hours spent sitting and the likelihood of developing diabetes?"
A critical examination is the kind of evaluation approach that uses a systemathic and logical way to understand the phenomenon at study. The issue is studied in a systematic way to analyze the content and the variables in order to find the best alternative for the solution. That is why the question "A" best represents critical examination.
It can be classified as mysticism.
<h3>What is mysticism?</h3>
A religion or belief in mysticism is based on communion or union with a god, or divine being. You can only reach enlightenment by overcoming the physical realm through mysticism. Mysticism is easily connected with crystals, New Age notions, or the occult. It is mystical, enigmatic, and full of wonder (the supernatural).
The truth is that numerous religions, including Hinduism, Judaism, Buddhism, and Christianity, have their own varieties of mysticism, emphasizing spiritual oneness and connection over rigorous laws and dogma. Outside of religion, the term "mysticism" refers to opaque, enigmatic, or illogical philosophy that favors mystery and wonder over reason.
Learn more about other religions here:
brainly.com/question/290647
#SPJ4
That he wanted it to be separate and different from the previous monarchy we escaped from. That we should learn from our past.
Mandela means that someone who decides to take someone else's freedom is prjudiced and narrowminded. He can not be free if he takes away someone else's freedom just as a person who does not have freedom.
A person who takes away someone else's freedom is not free.
Answer:
Government-managed healthcare
Explanation:
Under socialist system, all resources that exist in the country technically belonged to the "people". But they still need to form a government that take control over the resources and the people do not necessarily have the power to use those resources however they want.
Under this system, the government tend to control the resources/programs that's considered as basic necessities by the people (such as education, healthcare, food stamps for the poor, shelters, energy, etc)