All categories

4 years ago

Question 1

2 answers:

4 0

im assuming that this is a reference to Mohandas Gandhi and his various prosecutions during his campaign of civil disobedience in India.

The whole point of civil disobedience is that it causes a great deal of trouble and embarrassment for the civil authority. The offences are relatively minor and there is no attempt to resist arrest or prosecution.

Gandhi, himself a barrister, would not have denied that he had, indeed, broken the law. To recognise the authority of the law, even if it is believed to be an unjust law, and to accept the penalty the law provides is to retain the moral high ground.

All of this depends upon the civil authority operating according to the rule of law and imposing punishments that are proportionate to the offences. Civil disobedience embarrassed the British in India. One need not ask how the Japanese, the Germans or the Russians in the 1930s would have dealt with Ghandi.

2.they thought india needed help.

3.The options, as Gandhi put it in his statement to the presiding judge, was this: "The only course open to you, Mr. Judge, is . . . either to resign your post or inflict on me the severest penalty.”

aev [14]4 years ago

3 0

<span>1 Gandhi had broke the law,authority of the law, even if it is believed to be an unjust law, and to accept the penalty the law provides is to retain the moral high ground.</span>

You might be interested in

How many Communist dictators were there?

Crank

Answer:

Explanation:

i sory am jost A 5 grade help me go two me question

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

According to his critics, why did President Roosevelt propose increasing the number of justices on the Supreme Court?

postnew [5]

According to his critics, President Roosevelt proposed increasing the number of justices on the Supreme Court because he knew some of them would resign--meaning he could "pack the court".

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

which period in European history is most closely associated With the emergence of trade fairs, the founding of guilds, and creat

ollegr [7]

The period of Commercial Revolution is the period in European history that is most closely associated with the emergence of trade fairs, the founding of guilds and creation of the Hanseatic League. Hanseatic league was actually a defensive and commercial confederation that was created by the merchant guilds of their towns.

3 0

4 years ago

The modern state system is engaged in a struggle between the forces of supranationalism and devolution. Define both terms and gi

ioda

Answer:

Supranationalism is the unification of multiple states working together to achieve a common goal. Such priorities are diverse, ranging from world peace, economic benefits, military, and many more. Such member states also share political control, rules, and regulations. The European Union would be an example of that.

Devolution is the mechanism in which state regions claim an autonomous government. This can trigger a society to break up, also known as balkanisation. Yugoslavia is one example of that.

With reference to the political and economic geography of Europe, briefly discuss three changes resulting from supranationalism.

Answer:

One change in Europe that would benefit from supranationalism would be the development of the Euro, a common currency. Another move would be to create better economic power due to reduced tariffs, increased trade and open frontiers between member states. The elimination in conflicts and wars is also a significant change of policy generated by supranationalism.

With reference to the political and economic geography of Europe, briefly discuss three changes resulting from devolution.

Answer:

The formation of more states (balkanisation of former Yugoslavia) would be one change resulting from the devolution. Another adjustment would be the emergence of disputes and political instability owing to the difficulty involved in the process of devolution. Eventually, a rise in regional political power will result from a shift

7 0

3 years ago

Steps of lawmaking (three-step version)

notka56 [123]

Answer:

The right of legislative initiative belongs to both houses of Congress. The Article 1, Section 8 provides that Congress may issue all laws that will be necessary and appropriate to bring its powers and all other powers granted by the Constitution to the United States Government or to any department or officer thereof. However, financial bills can come only from the lower house of Congress, and the Senate can only amend them. Each bill passed by both houses of Congress, before becoming a law, is submitted for signature to the president, who can veto it within 10 days after that. The president’s ban is suspensive and is overcome by the repeated adoption of the bill by both houses of Congress by a qualified majority. If the president does not approve the bill, he will return it with his objections to the chamber from which it proceeds. This chamber puts in full the objections of the president in its journal and begins to re-examine the bill. If after consideration the bill is adopted by two-thirds of the votes of the chamber, then it is sent along with the objections of the President to another chamber, which also considers it again. If it approves the bill with two-thirds of the vote, then it becomes law. With a veto, the president holds back Congress. It is one of the tools included in the mechanism of the system of “checks and balances”. As it is known, the US Constitution was based on the principle of separation of powers, backed up by this system. The authors of this system set a goal to create such a mechanism within which each of the branches of government would have the opportunity to neutralize the usurpation attempts of the other.

Currently, the legislative procedure has become more advanced. All bills must pass three readings. Only congressmen have the right to directly initiate a bill, as before. The bill can be presented by both a member of the House of Representatives and a senator. For this, a member of the House drops the bill in a special box at the rostrum, and the senator passes it to the Secretary of the Senate or represents it himself.

First reading. After submission, the Senate Secretary reads out the title of the bill, appoints a committee to review it, and sends the bill there.

Second reading. Before the discussion in the chamber, the project is read out in full. During the discussion (debate), deputies are given the right to propose amendments to the bill. The rules of the chambers contain separate requirements restricting the introduction of amendments, both “torpedoing” bills and unreasonably delaying their consideration in time. The right to amend in both houses can only be granted to members of those committees that have substantive competence in the bill. Amendments are included in the draft text if approved by a majority vote of the members present.

Third reading: At this stage, amendments to the text of the bill are not allowed, unless otherwise established by the chamber unanimously. Prior to voting on the bill as a whole, it can be sent back to the standing committee. After printing and third reading, the bill is put to a vote.

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago