All categories

3 years ago

The disadvantage of owning a mutual fund that invests in common stocks is the risk of loss of ___.

Business

1 answer:

Ludmilka [50]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

"Principal" Since the value of common stock could decline to zero, investors do carry the risk of losing their entire principal. That risk is greatly reduced when investing in bonds, because if you hold a bond to its maturity date, you will at least get back the par value ($1000) of the bond.

Hope this helps :) -Mark Brainiest Please :)

You might be interested in

If accounting information is to be useful, it must be expressed in terms of

Novay_Z [31]

Answer:

accounting information?

3 0

3 years ago

Sunland Corporation had net sales of $2,425,800 and interest revenue of $38,200 during 2020. Expenses for 2020 were cost of good

ladessa [460]

Answer:

Prepare a single-step income statement for the year ended December 31, 2020

Explanation:

SUNLAND CORPORATION

Inconme statement

For the year endend December 2020

Revenue

Net Sales 2.425.800

Interes Revenue 38.200

Total Revenue 2.464.000

Expenses

Cost Of goods 1.458.200

Administrative expenses 212.600

Selling xpenses 282.000

Interes expense 46.400

Tax rate 139.440

Expenses 2.138.640

Net income 325.360

Shares issued 70210

Earning p/share 4,63

7 0

3 years ago

High income countries with larger governments as a share of gdp have generally

Scorpion4ik [409]

Answer: High income countries with larger governments as a share of GDP have generally grown at a slower rate than the countries with smaller governments.

Explanation: Developing countries or countries with less money typically grow at a faster rate than higher income countries because returns related to capital are not as strong. In richer countries, they have higher capital and tend to grow at a slower rate.

5 0

3 years ago

Douglas County sought bids for a construction project. Robert Taggart wanted to submit a bid but knew the project needed rock. H

Jet001 [13]

Answer:

No, there is no contract between the two parties because of withdrawal of offer (Revocation) before the acceptance of the other party.

Explanation:

When one party offers another party and after some time the offer maker withdraws the offer by communicating that they had revoked then the offer is no more available to the other party and is often termed as Revocation. So when the offer maker revokes before the acceptance of the offer by the other party then their is no offer at consideration to the other party, which means if there is no offer then their can not be an acceptance of an offer and of course when there is no acceptance then there is no contract.

The communication of revocation was held before the acceptance of the offer of the other party which agains says that the contract was not actually formed.

4 0

3 years ago

The partnership of Anderson, Berry, Hammond, and Winwood is being liquidated. It currently holds cash of $20,000 but no other as

Rashid [163]

Answer:

a. Contribution from Berry = $6,000

b-1. Contribution from Hammond = $22,556

b-2. Disbursement shall be:

Anderson = $8,889

Berry = $3,667

c. Amount to be received by Anderson on Liquidation = $11,500

Explanation:

As for the provided information we have,

Capital balances

Anderson 40% $20,000

Berry 30% $12,000

Hammond 20% $17,000 (Deficit)

Winwood 10% $25,000 (Deficit)

a. Total deficit in this case will be = Share of Hammond + Winwood = $17,000 + $25,000 = $42,000

Berry's share = $\frac{30}{30+40} \times 42,000 = 18,000$

Since Berry's current balance = $12,000

Contribution required = $18,000 - $12,000 = $6,000

b-1. Total deficit of Winwood = $25,000

Hammond share = $\frac{20}{20+30+40} \times 25,000 = 5,556$

Hammond's current balance = - $17,000

Thus, contribution from Hammond = $5,556 + $17,000 = $22,556

b-2. Total deficit balance = $17,000 + $25,000 = $42,000

Total sufficient balance = $20,000 + $12,000 = $32,000

Net deficit balance = $42,000 - $32,000 = $10,000

Anderson share in Deficit of Winwood = $25,000 \times \frac{40}{40 + 30 +20} = 11,111$

Thus, net capital of Anderson = $20,000 - $11,111 = $8,889

Berry's share in deficit of Winwood = $25,000 \times \frac{30}{40+30+20} = 8,333$

Thus, net capital from Berry = $12,000 - $8,333 = $3,667

c. Total deficit from Hammond = $17,000

Anderson share = $17,000 \times \frac{40}{40+30+10} = 8,500$

Anderson's current balance = $20,000

Amount extra contributed by Anderson = $20,000 - $8,500 = $11,500

Thus, Anderson will receive $11,500 on liquidation.

Final Answer

a. Contribution from Berry = $6,000

b-1. Contribution from Hammond = $22,556

b-2. Disbursement shall be:

Anderson = $8,889

Berry = $3,667

c. Amount to be received by Anderson on Liquidation = $11,500

3 0

4 years ago