Answer: $222,800
Explanation:
Given that,
Sales = $427,000
Cost of goods sold (all variable) = $173,400
Total variable selling expense = $21,200
Total fixed selling expense = $18,900
Total variable administrative expense = $9,600
Total fixed administrative expense = $36,300
Variable expenses:
= Cost of goods sold + Variable selling expense + Variable administrative expense
= $173,400 + $21,200 + $9,600
= $204,200
Contribution margin = Sales - Variable expenses
= $427,000 - $204,200
= $222,800
<span>I have not been an appointee of employee of any regulator at any point in the past two years. I have worked as an independent contractor for a computer company for the last 5 years. Since a regulator company is one that usually involves systematic schemes and benefits to the employee, my emoployer would not fall into the category.</span>
C. Provide objective evidence that a transaction has taken place.
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>If there is a major problem in a country that leads to the rapid withdrawal of foreign investment, this is known as International financial crisis
</em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The financial crisis was mainly brought about by deregulation in the budgetary business. That allowed banks to participate in support investments exchanging with subordinates. Banks, at that point, requested more home loans to help the productive clearance of these subordinates. They made intrigue credits that got moderate to subprime borrowers.
Big banks had the assets to become modern at the utilization of these convoluted subordinates. The money with the most muddled monetary items got the most cash flow.
Answer: None of the above
Explanation:
All of the above are correct.
For option A, Economists who advocate discretionary monetary policy do indeed believe that the monetary authority using this policy is more flexible to shape the best monetary policy to the existing circumstances.
Option B is also correct because Crowding out occurs when the government increases investment by borrowing which leaves less money for the private sector to borrow so they spend less. The government spent money here yet the private sector did not spend less so it is Zero Crowing out.
Option C by option B's explanation holds true because the entire amount the Government increased by was denied the private sector.
Option D is also true as not all Economists prefer rule-based monetary policy to discretionary monetary policy.
They are all true.
