The correct answer to this open question is the following.
White is a metaphor for power." James Baldwin. Unfortunately so true in the history of the United States.
As we have witnessed the recent horrible events in different parts of the United States regarding race violence, we have to make a stop and truly reflect on the reasons for white supremacy in the country. Since colonial times, the race has been an issue. Even after the Civil War, the lesson was not learned and the nation was still divided. Too many things have happened over the years. But white dominance is still one of the US characteristics in society.
Some people thought that the arrival of Barak Obama to the US presidency would change things and that he could unite the nation but things got worse. The US continues to divide more. And with the new US President, the country is completely divided. So yes, white is still the dominant political and economical force in the United States.
Answer:
The Great Leap Forward
Explanation:
Mao Zedong was the chairman of Communist Party of china (CPC) since its establishment in 1949 until 1976.
It was five year plan 1958-62 to industrialise china in the shortest amount of time and was aimed at producing mass amount of steel and grain. It was started in 1958 by Mao Zedong but the plan failed to industrialise the Chinese economy and thousand of Chinese were killed.
Commune was at the centre of the plan, a commune was combination of smaller farm collectives and had 4000-5000 households.
Guam, Texas, parts of mexico, cuba (for a bit), philipines until after ww2, puerto rica, us virgin islands and I think that's it
Answer:
2) “Separate but unequal” schools are unconstitutional.
Explanation:
This is a statement from the outcome of the historical <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em> lawsuit, which basically stated that "separate but equal" schools and facilities are unconstitutional.
From the passage, we can extract the words "the doctrine of 'separate but equal' has no place...Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs . . . are . . . deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment".
Essentially, this is saying that "separate but equal" is not actually equal, which means that the people (Brown) who sued the education district (Board of Education) were not awarded their full rights granted by the 14th Amendment - and that is unconstitutional.
In 1853 Japan ended its practice of isolationism
