Choice C: claim of value
Claim of value is a judgement. Proving something is wrong vs right, disproved vs approved
The correct answer is: It was lacking in formal military provisions.
At the beginning, the ships were merchantmen that were adecuated because of the lack of resources, and the fleet did not contributed very much in the war. Also it was lacking in manpower.
It had French supporters but not Spanish, and the British navy was superior but the most complete answer is the one above in bold.
The argument in favor of US economic aid to other nations is invalid because the premises do not relate to the conclusion.
An argument is valid when all the premises are true and build a true conclusion.
According to the above, the argument presented has the following premises:
- Foreign economic aid to other countries is a good investment for the United States.
- It comprises only one percent of the entire federal budget, about $ 20 billion.
And the conclusion it presents is:
- Returns untold amounts in increased sales of American goods and services.
According to the above, the argument is a fallacy because the premises are not related to the conclusion because:
An investment is an economic contribution to receive a later profit, in this case, the United States is investing, and those who are receiving the profit are private US companies. Furthermore, no argument is presented that relates the increase in sales of goods and services with this investment.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/2645376
That would be <span>A.labor unions
</span>
