not sure if this helps but I hope it does
sorry its so long
To date erosion scientists have failed to address — or have addressed inadequately — some of the ‘big questions’ of our discipline. For example, where is erosion occurring? Why is it happening, and who is to blame? How serious is it? Who does it affect? What should be the response? Can we prevent it? What are the costs of erosion? Our inability or reluctance to answer such questions damages our credibility and is based on weaknesses in commonly-used approaches and the spatial and temporal scales at which much research is carried out. We have difficulty in the recognition, description and quantification of erosion, and limited information on the magnitude and frequency of events that cause erosion. In particular there has been a neglect of extreme events which are known to contribute substantially to total erosion. The inadequacy and frequent misuse of existing data leaves us open to the charge of exaggeration of the erosion problem (a la Lomborg).
Models need to be developed for many purposes and at many scales. Existing models have proved to be of limited value, in the real as opposed to the academic world, both because of problems with the reliability of their results, and difficulties (with associated costs) of acquiring suitable data. However, there are some positive signs: models are now being developed for purposes including addressing questions of off-site impacts and land-use policy. Cheap, reliable and technically simple methods of erosion assessment at the field scale are needed. At the global scale, an up-date of GLASOD based on a scientific approach is urgent so that we are at least able to identify erosion ‘hotspots’.
In terms of explanation of erosion, the greatest need is for a full recognition of the importance of socio-economic drivers. The accession of new countries to the EU with different economic and land-use histories emphasises this need. Too often we have left people, especially the farmers, out of the picture. Our approach could be characterised as ‘data-rich and people-poor’.
Answer:
To prevent monopolies and oligopolies in economies.
Explanation:
Monopolies are organizations that have almost entire control of markets. <em>If I ran a monopolistic oil company in the US, I could in theory control the cost of oil by raising it higher/lower than any competitor and charge lots of households many more had there been competition.</em>
Oligopolies are organizations that work together to cut out competition, with the exception of the corporate ally. <em>If my buddy and I ran an oligopoly on oil, we would have control of the entire market together and control the costs of oil, in theory.</em>
Hope that helps, best of luck!
The following is a subsurface event that places during the rock surface is Melting. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
Melting?</h3>
Generally, As the name implies, melting is the process through which a solid becomes a liquid at high enough temperatures. This transition takes place at a predetermined temperature, known as the melting point, in a pure crystalline solid.
In conclusion, The next event takes place under the rock's surface and is a subsurface phenomenon: melting.
Read more about Melting
brainly.com/question/15873508
#SPJ1
Donald trump according to the year of 2017
Answer:
A forest is <u>a piece of land with many trees.</u> Forests are important and grow in many places around the world. ... Forests contain 80% of the Earth's plant biomass. Primary production is about 21.9 gigatonnes carbon per year for tropical forests, 8.1 for temperate forests, and 2.6 for boreal forests.
