Severe solar weather has the potential to cripple communication systems on earth.
Solar weather occurs when solar activity increases. Sudden bursts called Coronal Mass Ejections are the main culprits of <u>solar weather</u>. These CME's release bursts of plasma and charged particles straight towards the Earth. Once these particles impact the upper atmosphere they cause geomagnetic storms that interfere with radio signals and communication and possibly fry electronic devices.
Severe geomagnetic storms can cause devastation for Earth's communication network. These storms <u>interfere with radio communication, meaning that phone service, radio broadcasts, and even internet connection would be disabled</u>. Even worse, these storms can often damage electronics, specifically satellites. Damage to satellites can cause severe damage to modern-day infrastructure.
To learn more :
brainly.com/question/24427668?referrer=searchResults
Let's play devil's advocate just for fun. ;-)
1) neither of them are a concern. Even if humans overpopulate the earth, the strong will find a way to survive and Darwin's theory of evolution will determine who deserves to pass on their genes and rule the world. This will result in stronger and stronger humans each generation. Economic wealth is not a concern for similar reasons. The strongest, smartest humans will pass on their genes and their wealth, thus ensuring that only strong, smart humans will survive.
2) People who own the land should decide what to do with it. If there is a disagreement, they can fight about it, and call all their relatives to come back them up in a fight. Whoever survives the fight gets to make the rules.
3)Sustainable develpment strategies are not necessary, becauase God has a plan. We can continue to burn oil, deplete the ozone, and drive giant SUVs because God will provide for us, and then eventually he will take those to heaven who deserve it and let the rest wallow in their hellish filth. >:-)
This is a fun question. Since it's an opinion, it can't be wrong, right? LOL
Yeah they are and it’s because
Answer:
Sí, los hongos como los mohos son protistas en los que los organismos con un parecido superficial a los hongos
.
Explicación:
Hay algunos protistas que muestran semejanza en la apariencia con los hongos, pero hay algunas diferencias que los hacen diferentes de los hongos. Los protistas como hongos tienen una estructura como los mohos, su comportamiento de alimentación también es el mismo porque ambos se alimentan de materia orgánica muerta y absorben nutrientes, pero los hongos y los protistas similares a los hongos son diferentes debido a la composición de la pared celular. La pared celular de los hongos, como los protistas, está compuesta de celulosa en lugar de quitina. Son similares desde el exterior pero por dentro son diferentes.
Answer:
B. The sugar dissolves in the water and the lemon slices do not.
Explanation:
The lemons floated to the top of the glass and the sugar dissolved. Only the sugar is soluble
