Answer:
role-playing on attitudes.
Explanation:
Within the context of attitudes, role-playing refers to the act of embodying another roles or character that is not represent ourselves in normal situation.
In the simulated prison, the subjects are consist of students who actually friends/kinda know each other. They are divided into two groups and assigned either a guard or prisoners role.
Zimbardo then observed the interaction between the two groups. As it turns out, even if the guards know that their roles are fake, they start to abusing the prisoners as if they actually have power over them.
The term <u>Group dynamics</u> describes how a team communicates with one another, deals with conflict, and expresses feelings.
Group dynamics refers to the processes by which individuals in a team interact with one another. Group dynamic is influenced by the personality and attitudes of members, hierarchies, powers, and perceptions, among others.
The group may be formal (specially organized for a specific purpose) or informal (spontaneous).
Groups proceed through stages of <em>forming</em>, <em>storming</em>, <em>norming</em>, <em>performing</em>, and <em>adjourning</em>. These stages trace the development of how members communicate, deal with conflicts, express feelings, and find common ground so they can attain their best performance.
To learn more about group dynamics: brainly.com/question/13173075
#SPJ4
Answer:
- immediate physical surroundings.
- social relationships.
- infrastructure.
- industrial and occupational structure.
- labor markets.
- power relations.
- government.
- cultural practices.
pick any five you want :)
Please give me brainliest! you would get 25% as well!
Answer and Explanation:
1. Prosecutors may claim that the inaccurate report to which Rachel had access could induce misinterpretation on her part and that, in any case, Peter was already on the police for vandalism, which contributed to Rachel's conclusion. These justifications would not be successful, because Rachel had many ways to find out what actually happened to Peter.
2. Peter would sue Rachel for defamation and would likely succeed, as he has several witnesses that Rachel released incorrect information and that it affects his reputation.
3. The current malice is necessary in this case because Peter is a very well-known and popular person, and it is important that the current malice is inserted in the case, to speed up the process.
4. The fair report privilege can be used to protect Rachel, since the false information about Peter that she exposed, had as its only source a public document that induced her to publish the defamation.
The answer is; borrowing cultural forms and practices from elsewhere always involve borrowing with modification. People never adopt blindly but always adapt what they borrow for local purposes. Putting this another way, people rarely accepted ideas, practices, or objects from somewhere else without indigenising them.
<em>Please do tell me if I am wrong. Hope this helped! :)</em>
