European people and Native American people began interacting when the European powers took an interest in exploring and colonizing the region. As European settlements in North America increased, so did contact between these two groups. However, the relationship that was established between them changed greatly throughout the years.
Initially, the first European settlers depended on the Native Americans heavily. Native American people had better knowledge of the land, the weather, the local crops and the many other challenges that existed in the region. European settlers greatly benefitted from this knowledge. Therefore, the initial relationship between these people was one of cooperation.
As time passed, the interactions between the two groups grew. As the European settlements developed, both groups engaged in complex exchanges and commercial transactions. This led to more cooperation, but also increased conflict between them.
As conflict increased, the Native Americans began to suffer more. Lands were taken away from them, and many were displaced. Moreover, they were killed in great numbers through war and disease. This made the interaction between the two groups more negative.
Alfred Marshall is credited with first using cost benefit analysis
The involvement of the students in the Vietnam war support the argument that young people are strongly represented in antiwar movements.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The first rise of the student movement began in 1964 at the University of California at Berkeley restricting the political growth in campus. Soon, communities like Students for a Democratic society by University of Michigan an other communities formed the Port Huron Statement.
The involvement of the students in the Vietnam war support the argument that young people are strongly represented in antiwar movements. Communities held protests and burned crafts and slogans. There was rise of religious societies and civil rights organizations against the Vietnam war.
The Indian Removal Act of 1830
1. The Us were nervous because he was
2. I would view the U.S poorly. To let someone get assassinated is devastating. ( I was kinda confused on that one. Sorry!)
3. I think it was wrong that the U.S did nothing to stop it. I think this because just because he was leaning toward the Soviet Union for help doesn't mean you have to kill the person.
4. This is an opinion question.
I say kind off. There are other important people who got assassinated too.
Hope this helped!! sorry if not!
