That is true. Is there a specific question you have about it?
Answer:
<em>A</em><em> </em><em>form</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>government</em><em> </em><em> </em><em>in</em><em> </em><em>which</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>people</em><em> </em><em>have</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>authority</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>deliberate</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>decide</em><em> </em><em>legislation</em><em> </em><em>or</em><em> </em><em>choose</em><em> </em><em>governing</em><em> </em><em>officials</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>do</em><em> </em><em>so</em><em>.</em>
Answer:
The real advantage is that of having a considerable separation of power within the government.
Explanation:
With two houses or governing bodies in the United States, it provides less chances of corruption, a devolution of power among different institutions, and helps to keep a check on one another.
With just one house, there is too much power concentrated in the hands of a small number of people. This hampers the development of a proper democracy.
A democratization government needs to have a leader with limited power.
