1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
loris [4]
4 years ago
8

The British attacked china in the Opium War (1839-1842) because?

History
1 answer:
Illusion [34]4 years ago
8 0
The British had attacked China in the Opium War because China had terminated trade of opium from the British and burned all opium they could find in China. The British saw this as a form of aggression and therefore sent their troops.

The problem first rooted with tea (that was a pun :D). The British wanted tea and China had tea, but China wanted silver. Eventually, the British decided to buy the tea and sold China opium instead. This went well at first until China saw the effect opium had on their civilians. So China banned it, and burned any speck of opium. This got back to the British and they sent their troops.

Hope this helps!
You might be interested in
50 Points!<br> ⬇️Word bank ⬇️<br> Athens<br> Sparta<br> Both
mash [69]

Answer:

1.  Sparta

2. Sparta

3. Sparta

4. Athens

5. Athens

6. Sparta

7. Sparta

8. Sparta

Explanation:

1. by any means Spartans had the superior culture because they had the ability to fight and protect themselves.

2. Unlike such Greek city-states as Athens, a center for the arts, learning and philosophy, Sparta was centered on a warrior culture. Male Spartan citizens were allowed only one occupation: soldier.

3. Women in Sparta had more rights than women in Athens as well. Spartan women could inherit property while Athenian women had no such rights. Spartan women had the rights to own wealth and property. ... In contrary to Spartan, Athenian women could not own property in their own right.

4. Altogether there were over 1500 city-states in the Greek world, but some of these would barely qualify as towns in modern terms. Even Athens, by far the largest of all city-states, only contained an estimated population of about 200,000 people in the year 500 BC.

5. The Athenian form of electing a government was called Limited Democracy while the Spartan form was called oligarchy" (rule by a few), but it had elements of monarchy (rule by kings), democracy (through the election of council/senators), and aristocracy (rule by the upper class or land owning class).

6. The two city-states that best represent each form of government were Sparta (oligarchy) and Athens (democracy). Athens focused more on culture, while Sparta focused more on war. The oligarchy structure in Sparta enabled it to keep men and war as a top priority.

7. Oligarchy refers to a small group of people who govern a nation together. Democracy refers to a system of government in which every person has the right to participate. The two city-states that best represent each form of government were Sparta (oligarchy) and Athens (democracy).

8. Sparta was ruled by two kings, who ruled until they died or were forced out of office. Athens was ruled by arc-hons, who were elected annually. Thus, because both parts of Athens' government had leaders who were elected, Athens is said to have been the birthplace of democracy. Spartan life was simple.

3 0
3 years ago
Which factors were the greatest challenges facing the American economy in the years following World War I? A) trade embargoes an
k0ka [10]

Returning over 4,000,000 soldiers to the workforce and filling the void left by the cancellation of wartime manufacturing contracts .

Explanation:

The world war ended and there was an economic fading down because the country was involved in war time production and they have to transfer their focus to civilian and domestic production which was  a major challenge. Production lines were ramped down and that led to the return of the crores of soldiers to stay unemployed for a while.

American economy was also in the verge of falling in recession due to the economic slowdown. American exports also dropped down sharply due to the war. Consumerism during the roaring twenties boosted the economy slowly and there was a gradual increase in the economic stability achieved by united states after the world war I.

7 0
3 years ago
Who or what is being ask. He wrote the Gospel between 90 and 100 CE at Ephesus and Antioch.​
Dimas [21]

Answer:

Indeed, his work seems to be a narrative presentation of Paul's gospel in the life of ... but when Luke wrote he did not have Matthew on the desk in front of him. ... around 95-100 C.E. Church tradition put him in Ephesus at the time of writing, and ... to 75-80 (Matthew) to 80-90 (Luke) and for locations from Rome to Antioch

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Discuss anti-immigrant sentiments in the United States in the late nineteenth century.
Xelga [282]
<span>The anti-immigrant sentiments, or nativism, in the United Staets in the late nineteenth century is very well documented. Americans were mostly worried that immigrants come to the United States, move to cities and take American jobs away from Americans. Immigrants were willing to work for less and therefore more profitable for the robber barons taking advantage of the cheap labor. Therefore, nativism grew in the United States. This resulted in the passing of immigration legislation like the Chinese Exclusion Act and also the Gentleman's Agreement. The immigrants were also mostly from Ireland which meant that they were Catholic. Americans have always been hostile to Catholics because of previous conflicts between Catholics and Protestants.</span>
5 0
4 years ago
When does Locke say it is appropriate to use military force? Do you agree with him? Explain your reasoning.
adelina 88 [10]

Answer:

No, I do not agree with him because not every aggression can be solved with military retaliation, force, or killing in self-defense.

Explanation:

John Locke has a theory of war in which he describes war as being a state of destruction which happens because someone pre-meditated taking another person's life. In his theory, he states that a person may kill another if his life is threatened, in self-defense.

He further argues that war is just and fair because it is a response to aggression and that the aggressor loses his or her rights when he puts people in a state of war and any means can be employed to defeat the enemy because war has no rules.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What Empire did the Songhay Empire replace?
    13·2 answers
  • HELLO EVERYONE IM GIVING FREE ANSWERS FOR LIKES -INFO CHAN
    11·1 answer
  • What developments were the foundation of the scientific revolution
    13·1 answer
  • In the following statement, Adam Smith comments on the individual who uses domestic industry and labor. Use Smith's statement to
    5·2 answers
  • Why does the "Progressive Era" end abruptly in 1914? Would you consider the
    12·1 answer
  • MOCTEZUMA second ruled over
    8·1 answer
  • In your OWN WORDS define Estates General.
    10·1 answer
  • who was the dutch monk and scholar who critcized the folly of rome the catholic church and his fellow man in his the praise of f
    13·1 answer
  • 1. Who started the Maurya Empire?
    11·1 answer
  • This document is an article from the Virginia Gazette published on January 25, 1770. It was written by a white person who did no
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!