P=pages and H=hours, I’m assuming she read 20 pages, so C. h=20p should be correct, sorry if it wrong tho :)
Using the confidence interval, it is found that the correct option is:
There is convincing evidence because the entire interval is above 0.
<h3>When does a confidence interval for the difference of proportions gives convincing evidence that there is a difference?</h3>
It gives convincing evidence when 0 is not part of the confidence interval.
In this problem, the interval is (0.02, 0.38), which does not contain 0, hence the correct option is:
There is convincing evidence because the entire interval is above 0.
More can be learned about confidence intervals at brainly.com/question/25890103
Answer:
X>3
Step-by-step explanation:
Keep adding by the same value everytime so start with 10,000 then add 20,000 etc
Answer:
c. Inductive and Strong
Step-by-step explanation:
In inductive reasoning, provided data is analyzed in order to reach a conclusion. In this case, the argument provides data regarding Jane and Nancy's awards and their love for mathematics and then draws a conclusion regarding Nancy's performance in a particular class, this is an example of inductive reasoning.
As for the strength of the argument, it is plausible to infer that Jane and Nancy have similar mathematics skills since they both love calculus and excel academically. Therefore, if Jane does well in the calculus class, it is a strong argument to say that Nancy does as well.
The answer is :
c. Inductive and Strong
