1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
adelina 88 [10]
3 years ago
14

For what reasons would you support forbidding disloyal language about the military during wartime? For the reasons would you obj

ect to such a law?
History
1 answer:
d1i1m1o1n [39]3 years ago
8 0
One of the main reasons for this is in order to stop losing support for the war effort. As was seen in the espionage act and the sedition act, talking disloyally about the war effort was seen as treason and people would be punished for such things. This was because the government did not want the people to sabotage the effort and to prevent others from supporting the war effort. 

You should object to such laws because they infringe on first amendment rights since they are limiting your freedom of speech. Thanks to supreme court action, such laws would not be passed today because they would be unconstitutional since people have the right to criticize their government in a democratic country.
You might be interested in
Attitudes are on the surface and can easily change. They develop from values and opinions. True or false
kolezko [41]

Answer: the answer if false

Explanation:

e d g e n u i t y

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 8(Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)
Neko [114]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
During the Renaissance, a new intellectual movement known as humanism evolved. What was the significance of the humanist movemen
Usimov [2.4K]

Answer:

the answer is B

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
At the highest level of federal office, two presidents—_________ and _________—have been impeached, but neither was convicted by
a_sh-v [17]

Answer:

Bill Clintion and Richard Nixon

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
During plessy V. Ferguson. The supreme court ruled that the doctrine of separate but equal was?
iragen [17]

Answer:

Constitutional

Explanation:

Plessy v. Ferguson was widely talked about the case in the United States. It occurred in the year 1896.

in the ruling, the United States of America's Supreme Court ruled in favor and upheld the CONSTITUTIONALITY of Louisiana state law that supports equal but separate settlements for the white and colored races.

Hence, during Plessy V. Ferguson. The supreme court ruled that the doctrine of separate but equal was CONSTITUTIONAL

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who was Akbar and what is he well known for? A. a Mughal ruler of India who practiced religious and cultural tolerance B. an Ott
    10·2 answers
  • During the Continental Congress, two plans were put forth to create a design for Congress. Which of the following best describes
    15·2 answers
  • How did plessy v. ferguson affect race relations in the south and north?
    14·1 answer
  • Please help! 15 Points!
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the fallowing led to the increased popularity of automobiles
    8·1 answer
  • Native Americans were a problem in _______. A. Texas B. Mexico C. California
    5·1 answer
  • Marie curie contributed to society by
    5·2 answers
  • What was the importance of the Northwest Ordinance?
    6·1 answer
  • Which profitable crop was introduced by john Rolfe?
    6·2 answers
  • Helppppppppppppppppppp
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!