The correct answer is B) trust.
Patterns of communication where assertiveness and confrontation are the norms will create a relationship of trust.
This pattern will be of trust because when employers and employees have assertiveness in their conversations, this means that they are respectful and interested in maintaining open lines of communications, no matter the circumstances, This also means that confrontation of ideas is part of the daily business' communication, in which differences are welcome, ventilated in a respectful way, and at the end, members of the organization will come up with a solution.
Answer: The 1974–75 Shatt al-Arab clashes were a previous Iranian-Iraqi standoff in the region of the Shatt al-Arab waterway during the mid-1970s. Nearly 1,000 were killed in the clashes. It was the most significant dispute over the Shatt al-Arab waterway in modern times, prior to the Iran–Iraq War.
Explanation:
Well, one example would be a hare. In winter, they change by growing a big, fur coat to keep them warm.
Another great example would be ducks and/or chickens. When winter is approaching, they shed their old feathers (also known as "molting") and grow a new, thicker layer of feathers to keep warm. I know this from experience, because I have 2 ducks and some chickens of my own. =)
Hope this helps! ^_^
:
Answer:
1. Economic issues
2. Rejoiced at their freedom
3.Abrahalm Lincoln versus Andrew Johnson
Explanation:
1. Economic issues were the center of the problem after the civil war as the south, which was the major revenue generator of the country had suffered major damages. The former slaves now had their freedom and it became increasingly difficult since there was hardly free labour.
2. Before the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, black slaves remained optimistic and very much excited about the near development. And when Abraham Lincoln signed the Proclamation in January 1, 1863, there was notable joy amongst every Black American.
3. The presidential approach to reconstruction as led by Andrew Johnson, 1865, who took over leadership from Abraham Lincoln after his assasination, was one that favored the south, allowing them a sort of independence to decide on their transition from slavery to freedom, leaving the blacks no options and no opinions on the matter. As a result the North was against Andrew Johnson for his pro-slavery policies
On the other hand, the congressional approach as led and originated by Abraham Lincoln was moderate congress's open resistance to the pro-slavery policies of Andrew Johnson in 1867. The congressional approach contrasts sharply from the former by its harsh proclamations on the south and it's support for the former slaves in their political and economic participation. In other words giving voice to the black people.
