1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bess [88]
3 years ago
7

Discuss the resolution of World War I. How did it end? What consequences were imposed on the nation of the Central Powers and ho

w did those consequences affect them?
History
1 answer:
TiliK225 [7]3 years ago
8 0
World War 1 ended following a number of won fronts and battles after which numerous governments ended while some countries ceased to exist. Austro Hungary agreed to an armistice while some countries were completely run over. The consequences were severe. Austro-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire ceased to exist, while Germany had to accept numerous conditions such as giving territory, losing their army and weaponry, and numerous other things that left them highly dissatisfied, which only led to the rise of the Nazi party.
You might be interested in
After 1965, black civil rights leaders found it difficult to
kykrilka [37]
The answer is <span>B. protest the Vietnam War.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Is this person a citizen,eligible or wait to apply?I was born in the Philippine ,but I've been living in the US as a permanent r
murzikaleks [220]
This person is eligible for citizenship
3 0
3 years ago
In what TWO ways did Napoleon influence France during his reign?
Rzqust [24]
He created many advanced war weapons and artillery along with promoting public education to be funded by the government.
8 0
2 years ago
Which term is used to describe the type of slavery where a slave is treated as a piece of property?
AlladinOne [14]
Chattel, hope it helps you
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2. How would you argue against Aristotle’s defense of Natural slavery? Did he make false assumptions? Were his arguments illogic
larisa [96]

Answer: Natural slavery is inhumane and degrading.

Explanation:

Although natural slavery seems like it makes sense for a constructive society and Aristotle thought that slaves needed their masters to survive because they were so helpless, he was generalizing and his argument is flawed when most of the slaves who were freed in the 1900s could survive well on their own. I think I can argue against Aristotles arguements for natural slavery because his assumption is that slaves were lesser, more inferior humans or tools. I can disprove these by the obvious mistreatment these slaves were put through like: their owner hitting them or starving them. People who were slaves could not marry or raise children without their owner’s permission. And their owner could sell them or their children at any time.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the characteristics of the primitive agricultural, pastoral and foraging societies
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not something a state government can do? decide how its legislature is organized decide what textbook
    11·1 answer
  • Eugene Talmadge first gained the support of voters in Georgia because he
    9·1 answer
  • Mahabharata<br> What is this?<br> Lesson 3<br> page 6
    11·1 answer
  • Which statement best complets it????
    12·1 answer
  • Please help if you know the correct answer. I’ll give brainliest
    8·1 answer
  • What are the most striking characteristics of the Mercado Family?<br> ​
    10·1 answer
  • What are the similarities and differences of Daoism in your life today? plz help / explain
    8·1 answer
  • Once you have tied the overhand knot, what should you do?
    15·1 answer
  • I opened a grocery account at my bank with $100. Every week thereafter, I withdraw $45 from the account to pay for groceries. If
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!