Marks explains that we have been made to believe that conflict is bad and compromise is good. He describes this as a vision that is too simplistic to be upheld by the nations of the world. Marks says it will be difficult to determine whether conflict is good or bad if we do not understand the people involved in the conflict, the cause and the strategy involved in the conflict.
He said compromise, contrary to general belief, can be harmful if it does not protect the vulnerable and the dis-empowered.
Marks gave an example of a United Nations agency that collaborated with the federal and local governments, television company, and even a multinational soda company in order to address the problem of poor sanitation in schools in India. This arrangement helped the corporation to promote their brands and products. Marks argued that, the United Nations were creating another problem while trying to solve one by promoting a soda company, knowing fully well that a large consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages increases the risk of obesity.
The mistake governments make, according to Marks, when they collaborate with industries is that they conflate the common good with common ground. They sacrifice the interest of the people on the alter of industrial collaboration.
By saying that governments should struggle or engage in conflicts with corporations, Marks means that the corporations always act to promote their commercial interests while government is saddled with the responsibility of promoting the common good, they should not leave this responsibility while trying to go into relationship with the corporations.
I have had cause to go into conflict with a police officer in my state because he demanded a bribe from me despite having all my driving particulars. I shouted at him and promise to report him to the authority if he did not desist from that practice. he became scared and allowed me to go.
Answer:
operates under a set of rules and procedures
Explanation:
Bureaucracies are made up of experts, offices that perform tasks.
They are the instruments that enable the government to manage efficiently some essential functions.
Some may argue that their existence is obsolete, yet..
Bureaucrats have administrations for enforcing their own rules:
They also enable executive powers to be carried. Not only enforcing rules, but also creating rules. When people disobey the rules, bureaucracies punish for deviating from the norms.
The public policies are enforced by the bureaucracies, and although many and large bureaucracies may result, their existence is still needed for the governments to ensure that federal and state laws act in coordination.
Well this depends, if you are targeting a group of displaced people, that may be beneficial to the society already at the Caribbean Islands, then yes, of course it can. You may want to think of these people as potential tourists for the Caribbean Islands, and they may even want to move there. When you export a cultural identity naturally some people will identify themselves, and find themselves in that culture!
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>motivated </em><em> </em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>In psychology,</em><em> a motivated behavior is described as an individual's behavior that is being directed away or towards particular stimuli, as well as it is distinguished as persistence, vigor, substantial activity, and effort's exertion in both maintenance or initiation of a specific behavior carried out by an individual. It includes dynamics of an individual's behavior, for example, ambitions, needs, and desires, etc.</em>
<em>The correct answer for the given question represents motivated behavior. </em>
Answer:
Two inches is 1/31680 of a mile
